A couple of analysts have suggested IBM, Oracle or SAP. These all have have problems – Oracle only just acquired an open source operating system it’s not sure what to do with, and IBM always has need of more open source expertise, but it has a partnership with Red Hat and a desire to remain independent of operating systems in its service business. All these companies want SUSE to survive and thrive – but they don’t necessarily want to own it.
Microsoft, is in a similar category, with one added problem. Windows and Linux are both growing in data centres, and Microsoft has had to acknowledge the enterprise role of Linux, simply because its users are adopting Linux alongside Microsoft technology.
Microsoft now sponsors open source business events and runs educational webinars – such as one we hosted – as well as hosting open source code in a Microsoft-funded forge – Codeplex.com. Microsoft is also funding the Codeplex Foundation – a body, whose mission, to make commercial software and open software play together, reminds us of High School Musical.
But Microsoft has staked any open source credibility that it has, on Novell’s SUSE distribution. If Novell falls to bits, then Microsoft’s efforts to gain open source cred pretty much disappear with it. It’s something that would have been impossible to imagine a few years back, but if we’re looking for someone to prop Novell up, Microsoft would now be a prime candidate.
Of course, given the hostility within the open source community towards Microsoft, Novell and the deal between them, as well as to Codeplex and other open source moves by Microsoft, there would be big questions about how commercially viable Novell would be within Microsoft. But Redmond would be looking at this as an essential purchase for credibility, not a profit centre.
Whoever makes a “White Knight” bid for Novell is going to have to move fast, because talent there is going to leave if it looks like the company will be broken up. And even if the Elliot deal goes through, there is still the possibility of deals behind the scenes, points out Updegrove. For instance, Elliot might agree to instantly sell on parts of Novell to a differnet player – say an IBM, a Microsoft or an Oracle – as soon as it seals a purchase for the whole company.
The Elliot bid is on the table and there is no going back. Novell, as we know it is going to end – and at this stage, we simply don’t know what will replace it.
Page: 1 2
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
US prosecutors confirm earlier reports, demand Google sells off Chrome web browser and end default…
Following Australia? Technology secretary Peter Kyle says possible ban on social media for under-16s in…
Restructuring expert appointed to oversea Northvolt's main facility in northern Sweden, amid financial worries
View Comments
If Microsoft or IBM buy Novell then they would have an Identity Management product that actually works. Then they could get rid of ILM or TIM TAM which don't work nearly as well as Novell IDM.
I agree with your conclusion. Novell had its day with suse and performed poorly. Its time to pass the ball. I would not be surprised to see suse rebranded to Microsoft Linux, GPL and all. It's time for Microsoft to make a bold move. They've been coasting on their success for too long.
why the fuck would Novell be stupid enough to even Consider this!? They are thriving as a Business.... I can't see Novell Selling up and packing their bags.... They have got too much of a bright future ahead
Unfortunately Novell is not as thriving as Redhat and others, and their deal with Microsoft is due to run out.
However that isn't the issue. This is a hostile takeover bid. It is the Novell shareholders to whom this takeover will appeal, not the Novell board.
why would microsoft buy novell and rebrand suse. that would be competing against themselves. no one uses netware anymore except some pharma and other hippa companies. maybe make suse crippleware, which it is close to now imho. red hat might could, but then how is that all absorbed into the company, already with a brand of their own. hhmm perhaps it should just ride itself out. suse was a great distro back in the day. some move on some don't.