Since the store’s launch, Apple has cultivated a sense of ambiguity that continues to impact both developers and consumers. When it does divulge information on why it has rejected certain applications or it talks about its policies, the company is intentionally ambiguous, doing everything it can to not divulge too much about how it operates its store. That lack of detail makes some wonder if Apple can even be trusted.
Unfortunately, developers don’t know what their apps’ chances are of being approved once they send it to Apple for review. It seems that Apple likes it that way. The company has been criticized for years about its decision to let developers in on very little during the review process. It has said that it will open up to more developers going forward. But so far, few have been satisfied.
Speaking of the approval process, some developers are still wondering why it takes so long. Granted, Apple reviews thousands of applications, which slows down the process, but some developers are still waiting weeks before they find out if their application will be added to the marketplace. The sooner the apps are added to the store, the better.
When users are looking for content in the iTunes Store, they can find just about anything. Right now, several films and songs with content aimed at adults are available for purchase in Apple’s Store. And yet, applications that feature the same or, in some cases, even more innocuous visuals have been taken down. If a policy affects one section of a store, it should affect all sections.
Apple has done an adequate job in recent months outlining some of its App Store rules, but it needs to do better. Some of the applications that were recently removed from the store were selling extremely well. Simply removing them without a fair warning to developers was a major blunder on Apple’s part. It needs to establish policies that will determine how such a situation should be handled going forward.
Apple’s App Store decisions go a little too far. Rather than individually sift through the worst of applications, the company tends to use a broad brush to eliminate any applications that might offend someone. Fairness is certainly not guaranteed in Apple’s App Store, but a fairer process of vetting applications is definitely needed. Apple’s policies have negatively affected several developers that have created applications that might not have deserved to be taken down. It needs to address that.
Page: 1 2
Trump continues to target his former CISA head, signing a new executive order targetting Chris…
Two Chinese retailers warn customers in America that prices will increase next week, as Trump's…
Engineer Cristina Balan wins latest round in her long-running defamation claim against Elon Musk's EV…
Nvidia to partner with TSMC, Foxconn, Wistron, Amkor and SPIL to build $500 billion (£377…
American think tank warns about possible threat to US defence, after China imposes rare earth…
China is reportedly pursuing three alleged US NSA operatives, after cyberattacks on Chinese infrastructure
View Comments
With all this talk of offending this person or that person, I'm actually, quite literally, offended. I'm guessing they do this, because they don't want to loose customers, or business. Well, by continuing their practices, I think they're going to offend enough other people, who may or may not take their business elsewhere, that it's not going to matter if they kept the original clients that were origninally offended. One other thought, perhaps this is a smart business move. I can't help but think where a lot of the money comes from to buy Apple's products . . . Mom & Dad. Apple is seen as a cool young brand. I wouldn't think very many people, oh say 19 or so to 24, or somewhere around there would be able to afford the products, with school and not being established and all. So you have a large population of teens, that say to Mom and Dad, I want that, it's cool. 9 times out of 10 they get it. Idk, perhaps it does make good business sense to operate how they do.