The government continues to spend billions on proprietary software, despite promising earlier this year that it would create a level playing field for open source software and impose compulsory open standards.
A Freedom of Information (FOI) request by the BBC has revealed that most government departments still spend the lion’s share of their IT budgets on software from big-name vendors, such as Microsoft and Oracle, rather than seeking cheaper open source alternatives.
The Home Office, for example, currently spends around 80 percent of its software budget with US defence giant Raytheon Systems for “IT, Broadcasting and Telecoms software” – amounting to £21 million out of a total pot of £26 million over 18 months.
The Ministry of Defence, meanwhile, was unable to provide a breakdown of its IT spending, admitting that there is no centrally-held record of software used across the MoD. However, it said the Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) procurement body alone had spent £40.7 million on software between February 2009 and March 2011.
The full data set is available via Google Docs here.
The findings are perhaps disappointing, given the government’s claims in its ICT cost-cutting strategy in March that it could save millions of pounds worth of public money through encouraging small business innovation and embracing open source technologies.
Minister for the Cabinet Office Francis Maude admitted at the time that the government had wasted vast amounts of money on ineffective and duplicate IT systems, and promised to “end the oligopoly of big business supplying government IT by breaking down contracts into smaller, more flexible projects”.
“The Cabinet Office vows are frankly not worth the paper they are printed on. After more than a year of promises, there is not the slightest bit of progress, and related programmes such as increasing the number of SMEs supplying government are not only failing, they are going in reverse,” Taylor told eWEEK Europe.
Taylor pointed to the Cabinet Office’s headline project of creating an “IT and IT Services Asset Register” as an example of the government’s lack of commitment to open source.
Back in June, the Cabinet Office invited the UK’s leading open source companies to tender for the project, which was to create an accurate database of what the government spends on IT and how much of this is open source. Suppliers were given just one week to prepare their bids.
However the project – worth £100,000 over three years – was awarded to CDS, an established supplier of systems and information services to the defence sector, which had not even been invited to the meeting. The company’s e-PIMS property asset system is mandated for use across government.
“If the politicians, like Francis Maude and George Osborne, who claim this government are serious about open source are interested, they should be aware that Whitehall have turned their public statements on the subject into a farce, and have achieved precisely the opposite,” added Taylor.
Meanwhile, some industry commentators believe that the poor level of open source adoption in government is due to a stigma around open source software.
“The problem is that too many people think the best software is the most expensive software. As a result they end up wasting money on expensive proprietary technology,” said James Peel, product manager at open-source IT monitoring provider Opsview. “What we need is a culture change.”
Peel said that the private sector is now waking up to the cost-saving potential of open source technology, with companies starting to question their investments in proprietary monitoring software from larger vendors. “The public sector needs to follow suit,” said Peel. “At a time of austerity, the government can’t afford to ignore these more cost effective options.”
Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…
Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…
Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…
Welcome to Silicon In Focus Podcast: Tech in 2025! Join Steven Webb, UK Chief Technology…
European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…
San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…
View Comments
The article you use as 'proof' that the government committed itself to opensource shows they did nothing of the sort.
It said the government commits to "Open standards" not "Open source" they're two very different things.
Try reading the whole article, specifically the link to "Government commits to opens source route".
Minister for the Cabinet Office Francis Maude did say "The Government are committed to using more open source solutions where possible."
I would prefer my tax money to go to a Linux company.
I for one thing we should be using opensource software in ALL public institutions..
At least tax payers would be paying to advance computing for the entire world and mankind in general rather than a nasty American patent troll...
I hate the fact that MY tax is going to Microsoft which in turn funds legal attacks against Linux.
Any company that is against Linux is against advancing computing for us all as a race....
LinuxIT’s perception of the Governments position, based upon our discussions with them and their current suppliers, is that they are committed to the adoption of Open-Source and Open Standards more widely. We remain ready to contribute to improving the value derived from Government IT projects by actively embracing Open Source/Open Standards technologies.
As a fast growing SME specialising in the Open Source technology and associated professional services space LinuxIT is well placed to provide impartial, informed advice to central and local Government, and would urge them to engage either directly or through their System Integrator. LinuxIT have over 12 year’s experience in the field and have already engaged with the Cabinet Office contributing towards the delivery of their Open Source Policy. What’s called for here is a win-win-win outcome. With Government and Systems Integrators, and SMEs like us, all benefiting from a new approach centred upon sound management practices, and a blended technology approach that underpins Government’s technology needs, as well as providing value for money for the tax payer.