Thousands of Twitter users have tweeted the name of a footballer, in protest at his efforts to force disclosure of a tweeter who first revealed his name, which cannot be used in mainstream media because of an injunction.
Although it has been assumed that privacy orders to not apply to online social media, the footballer has gained a disclosure order that demands Twitter reveal details of the user who posted a list of celebrities with alleged injunctions two weeks ago. Meanwhile, foreign media such as Forbes have identified the footballer, as has the Scottish Sunday Herald, arguing that the injunction does not apply in Scotland. And the Telegraph has reported that a Times journalist faces a charge of being in contempt of court, for tweeting the footballer’s name.
“Websites such as Twitter have put a huge strain on the ability of the courts to enforce gagging orders and it has been widely assumed there is no legal redress against them,” said the BBC‘s media correspondent Torin Douglas. “Now it seems the law is about to be tested.”
The case is about more than just celebrity affairs. Two years ago, Wikipedia and Twitter users broke a super-injunction issued to shipping company Trafigura, which forbade discussion of allegations the company had dumped toxic waste in Cote d’Ivoire – and even banned mention of the injunction.
And while the celebrity Twitter storm has continued, an injunction has been applied to Twitter and Facebook – despite the widespread belief that such a thing cannot be done. The case should have more public sympathy as it is designed to protect a mother and her brain-damaged daughter.
The Attorney General Dominic Grieve has told the BBC he is not seeking contempt proceedings against the Sunday Herald.
Troubled battery maker Northvolt reportedly considers Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States as…
Microsoft's cloud business practices are reportedly facing a potential anti-competitive investigation by the FTC
Ilya Lichtenstein sentenced to five years in prison for hacking into a virtual currency exchange…
Target for Elon Musk's lawsuit, hate speech watchdog CCDH, announces its decision to quit X…
Antitrust penalty. European Commission fines Meta a hefty €798m ($843m) for tying Facebook Marketplace to…
Elon Musk continues to provoke the ire of various leaders around the world with his…
View Comments
People who seek to prevent publication of their wrong-doings deserve everything they get.
Celebrities are entitled to privacy, but if they don't want their extra-marital affairs discussed in public, then don't do it! Let's face it: a Big Brother contestant is an attention seeker, so keeping a secret of this nature may not be a priority.
As for the concept of stopping people saying they've been prevented from doing something... Come on!
Injunctions have their place, but it's not for covering up an affair.
Welcome to over-legislative Britain.