While the Green IT movement concentrates on the complexities of data centre power efficiency, a poll of eWEEK readers suggests CIOs should start with the apparently-simpler goal of just switching off all their PCs at night.

A single PC uses around 150W, not including display, so a thousand of them use a significant amount of power, and all too many are left on overnight. That’s why 40 percent of the readers who voted, said that turning their PCs off would be the most important action they could take to reduce their company’s carbon footprint.

Patches without power?

The reason so many PCs are left on overnight is often not simple laziness. HP last year offered a green widget which nags people to switch off, but in large organisations, it may not be up to the individual. Security updates and software patches can be issued at any time, and security staff do not want to leave PCs exposed to newly-uncovered flaws, so they need to be able to push those updates onto people’s desktop computers and laptops.

It’s possible to run desktop management systems that will switch off PCs at night, and which also lets them be woken up and patched when necessary, and then switched off again. However, research suggests that very few companies (around ten percent) are actually doing this.

Around a quarter of the poll – perhaps including the few that have already got their PCs under control – reckoned that the data centre is the best place to cut carbon. There’s a mass of work being done on better ways to cool data centres, and improved ways to measure their efficiency.

Eighteen percent thought less business travel would be the best approach – presumably replacing it with more efficient videoconferencing – though we have yet to see a good comparison between the amount of energy expended getting execs around the world in an average company, and the amount of power used in running the data centre used by the office drones.

Given the normal ratio between high-flyers and drones, we were initially sceptical this could add up to more than the carbon generated from wasted electricity by the masses in the company, but let’s have a quick think.

One long haul flight uses roughly 2000kg carbon per person (4000kg assuming they go come back). 1kW of electricty uses roughly half a kg of carbon. So each PC left on overnight uses 1kg per night. So, roughly speaking, a large company with 1000 PCs which run overnight wastes the equivalent of the carbon produced by two long-haul return flights.

It could go either way, in other words, depending how many flights you can cut per week.

Finally, climate sceptics – or people unable to get corporate backing for green initiatives – scored disappointingly highly. Seventeen percent of the poll said that reducing carbon footprint was not a priority.

What’s your next gadget?

For our next poll, we’re asking you to set aside the dull necessities of business technology, and tell us what you’d like your next gadget for personal use to be. the poll is on the left hand side of the site….

We’ve suggested a short list, but we think it could be looking a bit dull. We reckon there’s many areas we haven’t covered, so we’re expecting some action in the “other” category, from people who can’t live without a ride-on lawnmower, a medium-format digital camera or a wind-up gramophone.

Let us know in the poll and the discussion…

Peter Judge

Peter Judge has been involved with tech B2B publishing in the UK for many years, working at Ziff-Davis, ZDNet, IDG and Reed. His main interests are networking security, mobility and cloud

View Comments

  • We use Verismic http://www.verismic.com to automate all of this for us. We wake our systems automatically for patching but make sure that systems are powered off (or down if that is best for them) to continually save power. The flexibility it gave us over policies and automatic handling of exceptional scenarios made sure we could cover everybody better than through basic OS capabilities alone.

  • Switching off PC's is an obvious answer & by implementing cloud based solutions for the desktop security concerns go away.

  • I think that's just one piece of the puzzle, rather than the be-all-and-end all of the matter.

    The article mentions a widget that "nags people to switch off" a PC, but actually if building owners and employers invested in some intelligent technology then users wouldn't need to be nagged and the human error element can be reduced.

    My company (sorry, here comes a plug) Redstone Converged Solutions - http://www.redstoneconverged.co.uk - for example is heavily involved in intelligent buildings. It's possible to automate the powering on of a user's desk when they enter or exit the building using a swipe card (so that's not just a computer, it can be their phone powered down too). Powering down 500 phones and 100 access points overnight can save over 20 tonnes of CO2 a year! This logic can be extended to particular offices, meeting rooms or even entire floors of buildings. For example controlling HVAC, lighting etc. based on a user's actions.

    It's really time for people to see a holistic approach. Nagging users isn't enough... with intelligent choices energy consumption can be reduced, money saved, CO2 emissions cut. And with one intelligent system, a company can save power/money in multiple areas.

    If anyone is interested in hearing more, drop me a message. I'll have a more detailed article published in the near future too as it's an interesting area that can bring huge benefits to organisations.

  • Interesting to see some feed-back from eWEEK readers.

    I have had my head buried in the PC Power Management issues for the last few months producing a report on the topic.
    http://www.the451group.com/ecoIT/ecoIT_detail.php?icid=1448

    The long term take on this whole issue is that PCs are just the start when it comes to powering down idle devices. Approaches by companies such as Joulex, Verdiem and Cisco to centrally manage all the devices in an organisation is where we think this whole sector is headed: Enterprise Energy Management.

    The other issue is that powering down PCs will be a lot easier if predictions for the rise of desktop virtualisation follow the trend already happening in servers. This will in turn push the move towards thin clients and the whole power consumption from the desktop becomes less of an issue. True - some of the problem will be shunted into the server room but it will still be a more energy efficient proposition overall.

Recent Posts

Spyware Maker NSO Group Found Liable In US Court

Landmark ruling finds NSO Group liable on hacking charges in US federal court, after Pegasus…

2 days ago

Microsoft Diversifying 365 Copilot Away From OpenAI

Microsoft reportedly adding internal and third-party AI models to enterprise 365 Copilot offering as it…

2 days ago

Albania Bans TikTok For One Year After Stabbing

Albania to ban access to TikTok for one year after schoolboy stabbed to death, as…

2 days ago

Foldable Shipments Slow In China Amidst Global Growth Pains

Shipments of foldable smartphones show dramatic slowdown in world's biggest smartphone market amidst broader growth…

2 days ago

Google Proposes Remedies After Antitrust Defeat

Google proposes modest remedies to restore search competition, while decrying government overreach and planning appeal

2 days ago

Sega Considers Starting Own Game Subscription Service

Sega 'evaluating' starting its own game subscription service, as on-demand business model makes headway in…

2 days ago