Siemens Patches Stuxnet Flaws Even Though Super-Virus Is Dead
Siemens patches vulnerabilities used by the super-malware that was Stuxnet
Siemens has patched vulnerabilities that were used by the notorious Stuxnet worm to disrupt Iranian nuclear enrichment projects in 2010.
The flaws were in Siemens software known as Simatic STEP7 and Simatic WinCC software. Siemens said the vulnerabilities dated back to 2010, although it did not mention Stuxnet in its advisories.
Stuxnet was believed to have set back Iranian nuclear progress by two years by interfering with processing plants. It was capable of four exploits – something unprecedented at the time it was discovered – and targeted Siemens SCADA equipment, used in industrial facilities to automate production processes.
Past its ‘kill date’
Yet the worm, which is believed to have been created by the US and Israeli governments, has officially gone out of operation. It had a “kill date” of 24 June, meaning it has stopped spreading.
Siemens patches may have taken time and are now redundant when it comes to protecting against Stuxnet, but they could help prevent infections of similarly sophisticated malware in the future.
Meanwhile, F-Secure’s chief research officer, Mikko Hypponen, has reported on fresh complaints from Iran that its nuclear systems have been targeted by another cyber attack. Hypponen received emails from a scientist working at the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), claiming the popular hacking tool Metasploit had been used to penetrate systems and the attackers had access to the body’s VPN.
“I am writing you to inform you that our nuclear program has once again been compromised and attacked by a new worm with exploits which have shut down our automation network at Natanz and another facility Fordo near Qom,” one message read.
“There was also some music playing randomly on several of the workstations during the middle of the night with the volume maxed out. I believe it was playing ‘Thunderstruck’ by AC/DC.”
Hypponen said he could not confirm any of the details. “However, we can confirm that the researcher was sending and receiving emails from within the AEOI,” he added.
Are you a security geek? Try our quiz!
