A US court has ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05 billion (£664 million) in damages, after finding that Samsung’s smartphones and tablets infringed on Apple patents used in the iPhone and iPad.
In a session that took more than a half an hour at the San Jose court, a clerk read dozens of rulings on multiple counts of infringement regarding a variety of Samsung products. In most, but not all cases, the Samsung products were found to have infringed on Apple’s iPhone smartphone and iPad tablet computer. It’s a major victory for Apple in an ongoing patent war between the two companies, but there is sure to be an appeal.
If the jury verdict is upheld after the inevitable appeals, the $1.05 billion damages award has the potential to take a significant bite out of Samsung’s cash reserves, which totaled $23.8 billion (£15bn) according to its second quarter earnings report released on July 27.
The verdict was handed down by a jury in US District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose after a three-week trial and three days of deliberations.
Neither Samsung or Apple representatives spoke to reporters after the verdict, but Samsung issued a statement.
“Today’s verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer. It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices,” Samsung’s statement said. “It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies.”
The statement also asserted that “this is not the final word in this case,” while not specifically stating whether Samsung plans to appeal these verdicts.
However, Samsung noted that some of the rulings and appeals other Apple patent lawsuits in the US and in courts overseas have actually gone against Apple.Only this week, a South Korean court penalised both companies.
Apple sued Samsung over multiple infringements of its patents on the iPhone smartphone and the iPad tablet computer, seeking at least $2.5 billion in damages.
But during the trial, Samsung made counterclaims that Apple infringed on some of its patents and also tried to invalidate some Apple patents by arguing that they were based on “prior art,” meaning that the innovations Apple believed were unique were already on the market.
Apple, on the other hand, presented evidence that it claimed showed Samsung was obviously copying its design for the iPhone. Its lawyers produced several Samsung smartphones released before the iPhone came out in 2007 that were of various shapes and sizes, but that after the iPhone came out, new Samsung smartphones began looking more like the iPhone.
Apple also introduced a 132-page internal Samsung document itemising multiple features of the iPhone and noting how Samsung models in development at the time fell short of the design of the iPhone.
After the verdict was read, US District Judge Lucy Koh asked the jury to reconsider apparent inconsistencies in two of the verdicts where the jury found that Samsung had not infringed on an Apple patent, but awarded damages anyway. The jury reduced the damages in those two verdicts to zero. The change reduced the final damages award to $1,049,343,540.
The Apple vs. Samsung case has been closely watched by many in the Silicon Valley technology community because of its implications for competition in the multi-billion dollar mobile device market.
Samsung and Apple are the first and second best selling smartphone vendors in the market, respectively, according to figures from the research firm IDC. In the second quarter of 2012, Samsung smartphone sales jumped by 173 percent over the second quarter of 2011 to 50.2 million units.
Apple’s sales grew by 27.5 percent to 26 million units. The next two vendors on the list, Nokia and HTC, both suffered double-digit sales declines as customers gravitated to the top-selling Samsung and Apple devices.
Apple, however, holds a substantial lead in the sale of tablets according to a report from IHS. In the fourth quarter, Apple held a 62 percent share of the global tablet market, with Samsung’s Galaxy Tab line a distant second at 6.4 percent.
Are you a smartphone expert? Try our iPhone rivals quiz!
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
View Comments
Having heard some of the comments from the jurors you have to seriously consider whether this has been a fair trial. Apparently two of the jurors understood the technical issues and had to 'teach' the others, hardly getting a fair trial from all the jurors.
Another indicated it was how the Samsung executives came across in the questioning via a TV link to Korea. Very fact based decision!
Plus the prior art evidence being disallowed - ridiculous even late evidence should be allowed if a fair trial is to be had.
Or may be the real answer is a change in patent law to stop companies like Apple patenting ideas that are obvious and a natural progression from abusing the system.