In the case of Saudi Arabia, the answer is probably that they don’t care. Remember, this is a government that some regard as totalitarian as North Korea, and has approximately the same regard for human rights, except that North Korea doesn’t single out its women for slave-like status. Remember also that this is a government that willingly allowed a school full of young girls to burn to death rather than let them seek safety without having male relatives to escort them. Human rights are clearly not a priority in Saudi Arabia.
The real fear of the Saudi government is almost certainly that human rights advocates might be able to communicate with each other. This is, of course, a huge risk, since the free flow of information is the enemy of despots everywhere.
The situation in Dubai makes less sense. Here’s a nation that’s been seeking Western investment. It’s been trying to make itself seem to be the commercial hub of the Middle East. But now, it wants to compromise the commercial activities of the companies it wants to attract. By doing this, it gives those companies one more reason to find some other place to do business.
And this isn’t just because Western businesses want to keep secrets. The fact is that they’re required by their governments to keep information protected, regardless of the desires of the governments that they may travel through. If you’re traveling through one of these countries, do you think your compliance auditors are going to accept the Saudi government’s paranoia as an excuse for a security breach?
But realistically, this may not actually come to pass. There are millions of BlackBerry users in each of these countries, and despite the total disregard for the rights of their citizens, the Saudi government is probably not in a position to say no to all those business users who will go elsewhere if forced to do so by the government.
The same is even more true in Dubai, which is desperate to attract business, especially given the worry caused by the government’s huge debt. That government has to choose whether to simply give up on attracting Western companies, or think of some other way to satisfy is cultural worries. On the other hand, Dubai has given RIM until October to come up with a solution. It’s entirely possible that the problem will quietly slip out of sight in the meantime.
RIM, unfortunately, is learning the truth about a saying that is frequently heard here in Washington: no good deed goes unpunished. RIM’s good deed was making their devices as secure as their customers needed them to be. Now the company is being punished for doing its job too well.
Page: 1 2
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
US prosecutors confirm earlier reports, demand Google sells off Chrome web browser and end default…
Following Australia? Technology secretary Peter Kyle says possible ban on social media for under-16s in…
Restructuring expert appointed to oversea Northvolt's main facility in northern Sweden, amid financial worries