The legal backlash against the FBI’s closure of MegaUpload began last night as the Pirates de Catalunya (PP-Cat), the Spanish arm of Pirate Parties International (PPI), launched a collective civil action on behalf of legitimate users of the cyberlocker.
PP-Cat states that the actions taken by the US government were “unjustified and completely disproportionate to the aim intended” and has begun investigating breaches of law with the help of other international Pirate Parties include the Pirate Party UK (PPUK).
“This initiative is a starting point for legitimate internet users to help defend themselves from the legal abuses promoted by those wishing to aggressively lock away cultural materials for their own financial gain,” they said. “Regardless of ideology, or opinions on the legality or morality of those running MegaUpload, actions such as the closure of this service cause huge damage to lawful users of the sites and are unacceptable and disproportionate violations of their rights.”
Whilst the campaign will help channel complaints to the US government for those who lost files last week, getting a satisfactory response from the US government may still prove a challenge.
“MegaUpload.com expressly informed users through its Frequently Asked Questions (‘FAQs’) and its Terms of Service that users have no proprietary interest in any of the files on MegaUpload’s servers, they assume the full risk of complete loss or unavailability of their data, and that MegaUpload can terminate site operations without prior notice,” said a spokesperson for the Department of Justice soon after the closure of MegaUpload.
However, even if files cannot be regained, the legality of shutting down the site will remain an issue as Pirate Parties International seek to establish further violations of international law.
“We believe that the rights of ordinary people are being ignored by those intent on maintaining a flawed business model via excessive legislation,” said Andrew Robinson, Pirate Party UK Culture, Media and Sports Spokesperson. “We believe that unjust laws like SOPA, PIPA and now ACTA must be fought, and that ordinary internet users should have legal recourse against the copyright lobby.”
Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…
Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
View Comments
THE RULES OF EQUITY.
(from Snell's 'Principles of Equity').
EQUITY is no part of the law, but is a Moral Virtue, and a sense of Natural Justice; which reforms and moderates the rigour and hard edge of the law where it is defective or weak in the constitution.
If there is a conflict between Ordinary Law and Equity, THE RULES OF EQUITY PREVAIL.
("Ordinary Law" consists of "Common Law", "Precedent" and "Statute Law").
ALL COURTS ADMINISTER BOTH ORDINARY LAW AND EQUITY, THE RULES OF EQUITY PREVAILING IF IN CONFLICT WITH ORDINARY LAW.
In other words:
EQUITY is a sense of FAIRNESS and NATURAL JUSTICE which will OVERTURN ALL OTHER LAW.