NHS Trust Will Appeal Against ICO Penalty

An NHS trust has said it will appeal if it is instructed to pay a substantial fine that may be levied by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

In an initial letter of intent, the ICO has suggested a possible fine of £375,000; the highest penalty issued to date. The regulator claims that no final decision has been reached in the matter and that “The ICO is currently making enquiries into a possible breach of the Data Protection Act and is unable to speculate on what action will be taken at this time.”

First ever appeal

The Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust has no plans to comply, and unlike other institutions which hang their heads in shame and put on the dunce’s hat without complaint, it will appeal the fine. This would be the first time any organisation appealed against an ICO decision or penalty.

The trust believes that it should not be held responsible for the breach in the Data Protection Act (DPA) as it was a victim of a crime.

The breach occurred when hard drives containing patient data were handed over to a registered contractor for destruction, only to end up for sale on eBay. According to a report by the BBC, the incident, which the trust considers an act of theft, occurred in September 2010.

Duncan Selbie, chief executive of Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust said in a statement that as soon as the trust was alerted to the sale of the disks, the police was informed and the disks recovered. “We are confident that there is a very low risk of any of the data from them having passed into the public domain. We have subsequently received a Notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office proposing a fine of £375,000 which we are, in the circumstances, challenging,” he added.

Under current legislation, the ICO has the power issue a fine of up to £500,000 to organisations which have committed a serious breach of the Data Protection Act

The highest penalty levied to date was handed to Powys County Council in December last year, after investigations revealed that staff members had been lax in checking documents before sending them to members of the public, resulting in individuals receiving delicate information about unrelated children, along with with documents pertaining to their own.

Last week, the ICO stated in a blog post that it would not be easing up on offenders any time soon and urged companies considering cutting costs and corners in the their data protection policies to think twice, or face the consequences.

Iris Cheerin

Recent Posts

Apple, Google Mobile Ecosystems Should Be Investigated, CMA Told

CMA receives 'provisional recommendation' from independent inquiry that Apple,Google mobile ecosystem needs investigation

2 days ago

Australia Rejects Elon Musk Claim About Social Media Ban For Under-16s

Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…

3 days ago

Northvolt Files For Bankruptcy Protection In US

Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…

3 days ago

UK’s CMA Readies Cloud Sector “Behavioural” Remedies – Report

Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector

3 days ago

Former Policy Boss At X, Nick Pickles, Joins Sam Altman Venture

Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…

3 days ago

Bitcoin Rises Above $96,000 Amid Trump Optimism

Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…

3 days ago