The news out of last week’s Mobile World Congress in Barcelona illustrated, for the nth time, just how quickly the tablet market is evolving into something considerable – and it’s evolving quickly. Within the next few quarters, we can expect tablets powered by quad-core processors and running Android 3.0, competing head-to-head against next-generation devices from Apple and Hewlett-Packard.
Increasingly, it seems that Microsoft is willing to sit this battle out in the near-term. The next version of Windows will support SoC (System-on-a-chip) architecture, including ARM-based systems. Considering how ARM chip designs currently dominate much of the mobile space, that suggests Microsoft’s “Windows 8” will at least partially target the tablet market – whenever it finally comes out. In the meantime, a handful of manufacturers (Dell and HP in particular) are manufacturing limited-run Windows 7 tablets for the enterprise. Emphasis on the word “limited.”
Then came January’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, where Ballmer used his keynote to … not mention tablets at all. Instead, he chose to focus on Kinect, Windows 7 on laptops, and Windows Phone 7. Microsoft’s CES booth featured a handful of tablets, tucked away among the PCs and Xboxes, and they all seemed aimed at the Asian market – in marked contrast to companies like Samsung, which seemed uniformly determined to turn their respective CES areas into Tablets ‘R Us.
Windows has earned Microsoft untold billions of dollars over the past few decades. A product like that exerts its own special type of gravity on a company. But Redmond’s seeming determination to port Windows onto tablets, a form-factor seemingly more suited to lighter operating systems like iOS and Android, seems to me a recipe for disaster: trying to graft that user interface – built for larger screens, physical keyboards, and mice – onto a tablet is the tech-world equivalent of trying to make an elephant ride a unicycle. That’s not what it’s meant for, and nobody ends up happy.
Maybe the next version of Windows will offer something radically different and tablet-centric. In the meantime, I feel it wouldn’t be out of the question for Microsoft to consider porting a modified version of Windows Phone 7 onto the tablet form-factor. And why not? Windows Phone 7 is built for touch-screens, and its emphasis on side-scrolling suggests it could adjust to larger screen real estate. Certainly those developers working on Windows Phone apps would appreciate the chance to sell to more than one device type.
But Microsoft won’t do that, because of Windows’ continued grip on their corporate culture. And so we wait – or not – for the company to make its big consumer tablet play.
CMA receives 'provisional recommendation' from independent inquiry that Apple,Google mobile ecosystem needs investigation
Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…
Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
View Comments
Android and Apple's iOS work on both phone and tablet, which vastly increases the scope and profit of apps.
Windows Phone 7 has had lacklustre phone sales, which (worryingly) have been decreasing since launch. App developers want to use their apps on phones and tablets, but Windows Phone 7 works on just phones. The OS has been cut off at the knees.
And Nokia, which foolishly and bizarrely bet its future on Windows Phone 7, will exclude itself from the tablet market.
As the article says, the tablet market is already dominated by iOS and Android. By the time Microsoft gets into this market (2012 or later), the market will have already been taken by competitors.
The two most inept companies in mobile are Microsoft and Nokia, so I guess it's rather fitting that these two hold hands so that they can fail together.
Windows Phone and Desktop applications use .NET. This common language runtimes allow you to easily port your app to Windows Phone 7(ARM), Windows 7 Desktop (x86), Xbox 360 (PowerPC) and future tablets running ARM without any problems. So this is a non-issue.
Windows Phone 7 sales have been steady and comparable to Android when it first launched. The Nokia deal means Microsoft will have a huge market for the phones. In Europe, Nokia was synonymous with mobile phones couple of years back. Having WP7 as the OS of choice on Nokia phones will be a great boost.
The mobile phone market is by no means set in stone. They are the most fickle of consumers and change devices more regularly so MS is not out of the race by any means. The tablet market has only just managed to get momentum and 2012/13 seems to be the prime time for it. Microsoft’s challenge is to release an OS running on ARM with touch interface and I think they are primed to do just that with Windows 8.