Microsoft has responded to unconfirmed reports that Google’s patience over Windows security may have finally snapped.
Microsoft officials instead opted to highlight the security of its Windows OS in response to Google’s alleged plans to transition its employees away from Windows-based systems because of security issues.
According to online reports, Google executives have supposedly pushed the search engine giant’s 20,000 employees to switch to either Macs or Linux-based machines, following a January security breach that took advantage of an Internet Explorer vulnerability to steal some of Google’s intellectual property.
Google itself may have been somewhat reticent to confirm the reports – a spokesperson told eWEEK 1 June that “we’re always working to improve the efficiency of our business,” while refusing to comment on specific operational matters – but Microsoft decided that confrontation was the best policy.
“When it comes to security, even hackers admit we’re doing a better job making our products more secure than anyone else. And it’s not just the hackers; third party influentials and industry leaders like Cisco tell us regularly that our focus and investment continues to surpass others.”
After citing an article that “discusses how Macs are under attack by high-risk malware,” LeBlanc describes the steps supposedly taken by Microsoft to make its customers’ systems more secure. Among them: shipping software and security updates regularly through Windows Update and Microsoft Update, encouraging Automatic Update to protect from attacks, and adding improvements in BitLocker and Windows Firewall. Windows 7 also “uses Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) as well by randomising data in memory,” to bolster security.
The possibility exists that Google enacted its alleged Windows ban not because of security concerns, but to clear the way internally for its Chrome OS, a cloud-based operating system that will be released to the general public later in 2010.
In that way, Google would be following in the footsteps of Microsoft itself, where employees generally use Windows, or Apple, where Macs are obviously the system of corporate choice.
“I have to wonder how much of this is due to competitive drivers versus genuine desire to secure Google,” IDC analyst Al Hilwa told eWEEK. “After all, Google has operating systems, browsers, tools and productivity software that is head-to-head competitive with Microsoft and so this may make sense for them.”
That being said, Hilwa did see some utility in a company embracing more uncommon software for its IT infrastructure.
“There is such a thing as security through obscurity,” Hilwa added, “and it can be quite effective in certain settings. If I wanted to have the least attractive stack for virus and malware attacks, I would use the most obscure stack I can find, potentially including custom-developed components.”
Given the increased competition between Microsoft and Google, executives for the latter company may have seen a natural shift to Chrome OS as an opportunity to fire a public broadside at their rival’s primary software offering. Microsoft’s response highlights how much the company depends on Windows being perceived as armour-clad.
Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
View Comments
I am sure, lots of people do their best to improve security by MS. Certainly, if Google webaps would have an as big market share by inexperienced users, they will be targeted and may be shown vulnerable.
But is all this relevant for the user now? Look at the article "Using Windows for a Day Cost Mac User $100,000" on KrebsonSecurity. Where should they be when playing with their money using the internet, on the place that is under attack or...
Is MS up to having such a market share?