Kile Goodwin, one of countless customers who lost access to their files when popular cyber-locker Megaupload was closed by the US Department of Justice, was yesterday told he can get his data back, if he is willing to pay for it.
According to prosecutors, getting access to the files was never the issue. But since identifying, copying and retrieving data would be an expensive process, it suggested the unfortunate sports reporter from Ohio should pay these costs himself.
Megaupload was at one time the 13th biggest website on the Internet. It was closed down in January as part of a multinational co-operative move against online intellectual property rights infringement. The founder Kim Dotcom and three of his employees were taken into custody by New Zealand police.
Meanwhile, Carpathia Hosting, one of the companies Megaupload used to store customer files, has claimed the upkeep of the cyberlocker’s 25 petabytes of user data on 1,103 servers is costing it $9000 (£5,700) a day.
“Access is not the issue — if it was, Mr. Goodwin could simply hire a forensic expert to retrieve what he claims is his property and reimburse Carpathia for its associated costs,” said the response to the EFF motion, reported by PC Advisor.
“The issue is that the process of identifying, copying, and returning Mr. Goodwin’s data will be inordinately expensive, and Mr. Goodwin wants the government, or Megaupload, or Carpathia, or anyone other than himself, to bear the cost.”
US federal prosecutors suggested that Megaupload or Carpathia could be sued for breach of contract, in order to recover the losses associated with retrieval of data.
Last week, Megaupload lawyers had accused the FBI of “illegally” copying digital evidence to build a case against the founder of the company Kim Dotcom and his employees.
The trial of Dotcom and the site’s management team is due to start on 6 August.
Arrgh! How much do you know about online piracy? Take our quiz!
CMA receives 'provisional recommendation' from independent inquiry that Apple,Google mobile ecosystem needs investigation
Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…
Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
View Comments
What a load of nonsense. First the government played fast and loose with the facts, and now the courts. What BS.
Irrespective of whether the site should have been closed, the way the site was closed was less than sensible, sufficient time should have been allowed for the recovery of user data.
Maybe all that is required is to bring the site up again for a short time so users have the ability to recover their data.
Although it does emphasise the sheer stupidity of relying on the cloud to store valuable data. But some people never learn or listen.
A cloud is just vapour and disappears - cloud computing is well named!
Just to be clear, I do not think it was the "court" that responded that the end users should pay to get their data. It was the prosecution. I do believe the Judge has yet to rule on this issue.
Thanks, Bob! Story fixed.