Kile Goodwin, one of countless customers who lost access to their files when popular cyber-locker Megaupload was closed by the US Department of Justice, was yesterday told he can get his data back, if he is willing to pay for it.
According to prosecutors, getting access to the files was never the issue. But since identifying, copying and retrieving data would be an expensive process, it suggested the unfortunate sports reporter from Ohio should pay these costs himself.
Megaupload was at one time the 13th biggest website on the Internet. It was closed down in January as part of a multinational co-operative move against online intellectual property rights infringement. The founder Kim Dotcom and three of his employees were taken into custody by New Zealand police.
Meanwhile, Carpathia Hosting, one of the companies Megaupload used to store customer files, has claimed the upkeep of the cyberlocker’s 25 petabytes of user data on 1,103 servers is costing it $9000 (£5,700) a day.
“Access is not the issue — if it was, Mr. Goodwin could simply hire a forensic expert to retrieve what he claims is his property and reimburse Carpathia for its associated costs,” said the response to the EFF motion, reported by PC Advisor.
“The issue is that the process of identifying, copying, and returning Mr. Goodwin’s data will be inordinately expensive, and Mr. Goodwin wants the government, or Megaupload, or Carpathia, or anyone other than himself, to bear the cost.”
US federal prosecutors suggested that Megaupload or Carpathia could be sued for breach of contract, in order to recover the losses associated with retrieval of data.
Last week, Megaupload lawyers had accused the FBI of “illegally” copying digital evidence to build a case against the founder of the company Kim Dotcom and his employees.
The trial of Dotcom and the site’s management team is due to start on 6 August.
Arrgh! How much do you know about online piracy? Take our quiz!
Denial from TSMC, after multiple reports it was in talks with Intel over a joint…
CEO Tim Cook talks to Trump official, as IDC notes China's smartphone market growth, and…
Another big name chip maker expects a hefty financial charge, after the US tightened rules…
More bad news for Google. Second time in less than a year that some part…
Federal office that tackled misinformation and disinformation from hostile nations is closed down, after criticism…
After Nvidia admits it will take $5.5 billion charge as Trump export limits of slower…
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="124px" width="167px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
View Comments
What a load of nonsense. First the government played fast and loose with the facts, and now the courts. What BS.
Irrespective of whether the site should have been closed, the way the site was closed was less than sensible, sufficient time should have been allowed for the recovery of user data.
Maybe all that is required is to bring the site up again for a short time so users have the ability to recover their data.
Although it does emphasise the sheer stupidity of relying on the cloud to store valuable data. But some people never learn or listen.
A cloud is just vapour and disappears - cloud computing is well named!
Just to be clear, I do not think it was the "court" that responded that the end users should pay to get their data. It was the prosecution. I do believe the Judge has yet to rule on this issue.
Thanks, Bob! Story fixed.