Categories: SecurityWorkspace

Manchester Police Slapped With £120,000 Data Breach Fine

Greater Manchester Police has been hit with a £120,000 fine for failing to keep data properly secure, placing information in danger when a USB stick was stolen.

A memory stick containing sensitive personal data, including details of more than a thousand people with links to serious crime investigations, was taken from an officer’s home. As there was no password protection on that stick, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) took action.

During its investigation, the data protection watchdog found a number of officers across the force regularly used unencrypted memory sticks, despite a similar breach taking place in 2010.

Manchester police pay up

The Manchester police force has already paid the fine, avoiding a £150,000 penalty by paying early.

“This was truly sensitive personal data, left in the hands of a burglar by poor data security. The consequences of this type of breach really do send a shiver down the spine,” said David Smith, ICO director of Data Protection.

“It should have been obvious to the force that the type of information stored on its computers meant proper data security was needed. Instead, it has taken a serious data breach to prompt it into action.

“This is a substantial monetary penalty, reflecting the significant failings the force demonstrated. We hope it will discourage others from making the same data protection mistakes.”

The ICO has fined a significant number of public sector firms since it was given the ability to hand out monetary penalties in April 2010. It recently hit a private firm, however, handing Welcome Financial Services (WFS) a £150,000 fine for a data breach that saw over half a million customers’ details go missing.

Yet last week, the watchdog praised the private sector for its data protection practices, although the data on which its assumptions were based was called into question.

Are you a security guru? Try our quiz!

Thomas Brewster

Tom Brewster is TechWeek Europe's Security Correspondent. He has also been named BT Information Security Journalist of the Year in 2012 and 2013.

View Comments

  • The idiot officer in question should be sacked, it's just pure laziness and blatant negligence. It's not an isolated incident and there have been plenty of warnings in the past so there should be no excuse. Zero tolerance!

Recent Posts

Apple Sales Rise 6 Percent After Early iPhone 16 Demand

Fourth quarter results beat Wall Street expectations, as overall sales rise 6 percent, but EU…

21 hours ago

X’s Community Notes Fails To Stem US Election Misinformation – Report

Hate speech non-profit that defeated Elon Musk's lawsuit, warns X's Community Notes is failing to…

22 hours ago

Google Fined More Than World’s GDP By Russia

Good luck. Russia demands Google pay a fine worth more than the world's total GDP,…

23 hours ago

Spotify, Paramount Sign Up To Use Google Cloud ARM Chips

Google Cloud signs up Spotify, Paramount Global as early customers of its first ARM-based cloud…

2 days ago

Meta Warns Of Accelerating AI Infrastructure Costs

Facebook parent Meta warns of 'significant acceleration' in expenditures on AI infrastructure as revenue, profits…

2 days ago

AI Helps Boost Microsoft Cloud Revenues By 33 Percent

Microsoft says Azure cloud revenues up 33 percent for September quarter as capital expenditures surge…

2 days ago