LGA Demands ‘Swift Action’ On Reducing Data Reports

Local Authorities are tiring of delivering huge amounts of data reports that disappear into the “black hole” of government administration, according to the Local Government Association (LGA).

In a critical commentary published by the LGA, the public authority organisation said it welcomed the initiative announced by Eric Pickles MP, secretary of state for Communities and Local Government, on 13 October 2010 but wants to see “swift action rather than warm rhetoric”.

Wasting money and staff hours

As an example of this burden on local authority resources, the report states that Leicestershire County Council research shows that the public sector was reporting on over 3,000 data sets which involved 92 members of staff and cost £3.7 million per year. It also specified that Luton Borough Council’s figures put the report numbers at 1,838, using 60 staff and costing £2.2 million.

The LGA is unhappy with progress since Pickles announced that the National Indicator Set would be replaced with a single comprehensive list. The list is still a work in progress but is expected to be completed during March in time for the review in April.

“Councils cannot afford to waste money and staff hours collecting and reporting information which disappears into a black hole of central government bureaucracy,” said David Parsons, the LGA Improvement Board chairman and leader of Leicestershire County Council.

Old habits die hard

“We’ve heard positive noises from government about reducing time-consuming and costly Whitehall box-ticking but old habits die hard. Of the 45 data collections being rolled back, another 18 have already been announced in their place,” he complained.

Working with the sample list of currently required reports, provided by the government, the LGA singles out 14 for immediate deletion and a further 25 that could be reduced or eliminated. The report adds that many of the data items that have been removed relate mainly to derived data, so the master reports still need to be run for the items from which the extractions were made. In addition, new data tables have been added that more than cancels any savings from the deleted items.

“We are disappointed by the scale of reductions proposed so far and remain unconvinced about the extent of the government’s ambition to minimise the reporting burden on councils,” said Parsons.

Eric Doyle, ChannelBiz

Eric is a veteran British tech journalist, currently editing ChannelBiz for NetMediaEurope. With expertise in security, the channel, and Britain's startup culture, through his TechBritannia initiative

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

3 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

3 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

3 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

4 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

4 days ago