Keep Using SecurID, Despite The RSA Breach

Two-factor authentication has been considered by many to be the gold standard for secure IT access. The idea is that you must have two things, something you have (such as a token) and something you know (such as a password).

Many companies, for example, require a smart card with an embedded identity chip to be inserted into a card reader before users can access corporate IT systems. Once the smart card is inserted, you’re then prompted for your password.

The SecurID security device, from RSA, was a token that you didn’t have to insert. It would present a number to the user that changed every 30 seconds. By typing in the number to a SecurID prompt, it demonstrated evidence that you had the token and would then let you enter a password. Exactly how RSA knew what number was the correct number at any given time was part of its strength – you didn’t need to equip your computers with card readers to have two-factor authentication.

Did hackers get the SecurID algorithm?

The algorithm that lets RSA know what number is the correct number may be part of what was stolen in a security breach of RSA’s data systems. Right now, RSA is frantically telling customers that their data is still safe. RSA is probably right. The simple possession of the algorithm isn’t enough to allow someone to break into an existing secure system.

The algorithm may tell how the process is accomplished, but in itself it isn’t going to reveal those numbers that change every 30 seconds. Even stealing a company’s key from RSA probably won’t help because it won’t reveal the correct number for the token at any given moment.

What’s more likely is that someone really wanted to know how the RSA SecurID worked, either so they could make their own competing product or so they could reverse engineer a device that eventually might be able to help gain access to protected information. But in reality, we don’t know for sure – because all that RSA has revealed is that information related to SecurID was taken, but they aren’t saying what that information was.

Page: 1 2

Wayne Rash

Wayne Rash is senior correspondent for eWEEK and a writer with 30 years of experience. His career includes IT work for the US Air Force.

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

3 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

3 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

3 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

3 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

3 days ago