The company at the heart of BBC Three programme ‘The Call Centre’ has been fined a total of £225,000 for cold caller offences, but it won’t be taking the penalty lightly.
Nationwide Energy Services was hit with a £125,000 penalty, whilst We Claim You Gain was slapped with a £100,000 fine, after they were found to have breached Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations covering electronic marketing. Both are part of Save Britain Money based in Swansea, which is the focus of the BBC TV show.
There were over 2,700 complaints relating to Save Britain Money’s cold caller operations, either handed to the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) or the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) between 26 May 2011 and 31 December 2012.
‘The Call Centre’ TV show, which is still running on BBC Three, is a fly-on-the-wall documentary that focuses on Save Britain Money founder and CEO Nev Wilshere (pictured) and his employees. It has received positive reviews, with some comparing it to comedy classic ‘The Office’ and Wilshere to David Brent.
The firm, which was named by The Sunday Times as one of the best places in Britain to work in 2013, issued a joint statement on behalf of its subsidiaries, saying it would be appealing: “Neither NES nor WCUG accept that issuing monetary penalty notices is the appropriate course of action. Both have made the necessary representations to the ICO and will be issuing a formal appeal shortly.”
The two subsidiaries also failed to check whether people they were calling had registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS), as is required by law, the ICO said.
“The public have told us that they are fed up with the constant bombardment of nuisance calls. While the activities of Nev and his call centre employees have provided entertainment for many, they hide a bigger problem within the cold calling industry,” said ICO director of operations Simon Entwisle.
“We’d like to see it made easier for us to issue penalties to companies who are breaking the rules. Similarly, everyone involved seems to agree that the rules on how consumers give their consent to receive calls needs to be clearer.”
Are you a pedant on privacy? Try our quiz!
Landmark ruling finds NSO Group liable on hacking charges in US federal court, after Pegasus…
Microsoft reportedly adding internal and third-party AI models to enterprise 365 Copilot offering as it…
Albania to ban access to TikTok for one year after schoolboy stabbed to death, as…
Shipments of foldable smartphones show dramatic slowdown in world's biggest smartphone market amidst broader growth…
Google proposes modest remedies to restore search competition, while decrying government overreach and planning appeal
Sega 'evaluating' starting its own game subscription service, as on-demand business model makes headway in…
View Comments
Agree with the company its totally wrong fining the company. It should be a jail sentence for the MD and the operators - they knew what they were doing was wrong!
It goes to show that have a cavalier attitude to privacy catches up on you in the end. He should have been using; http://www.ukphonebook.com/tps_check