IBM employees may be delighted to learn that they can use their shiny new iPhone 4S on the company’s internal networks, but will soon be disappointed once they find out that the use of Siri has been banned.

The iPhone’s voice-recognition software has been banned by IBM over concerns about what data is being submitted to Apple, what happens to it, and who is looking at it.

IBM Spoilsports

Apple’s user agreement states that everything said to Siri is recorded and sent to Apple in order to convert it into text. It also says that by using the application, the user is consenting to the transmission, collection, maintenance, processing and used of this data, while Siri also collects information such as address book data to help it function.

IBM CIO Jeanette Horan has confirmed that the company is concerned about where the data is stored, and given that Siri can be used to write emails and text messages, it is possible that Apple could be storing confidential IBM messages.

Siri uses a significant amount of data, meaning that it was always likely to raise a few eyebrows, but companies such as IBM shouldn’t worry too much if its employees are asking for smartphone advice or have strong accents, as it notoriously struggles to understand them.

There is nothing to stop IBM workers from using Siri on their mobile network however, and if they really are desperate to use a voice activated personal assistant on their iPhone, they could always use British rival Evi.

How closely have you been following the evolution of the iPhone? Find out with our quiz!

Steve McCaskill

Steve McCaskill is editor of TechWeekEurope and ChannelBiz. He joined as a reporter in 2011 and covers all areas of IT, with a particular interest in telecommunications, mobile and networking, along with sports technology.

View Comments

  • IBM has a serious point - its possible if other conversations can be picked via the Siri service, then it becomes a serious security risk and possibly breeching privacy and legislation. If the information was just processed and then deleted fine - but if stored then its heading towards the high security risk category.

Recent Posts

CATL ‘In Talks’ For Controlling Stake In Nio’s Power Unit

Battery giant CATL reportedly in talks to buy controlling stake in unit of EV maker…

27 mins ago

BYD Launches Luxury Denza EV Brand In Europe

Chinese EV giant BYD launches high-end Denza brand in Europe to compete with Mercedes, BMW…

57 mins ago

US Power Utilities Receive Massive AI Data Centre Requests

US power companies say in some cases data centre requests exceed their peak demand or…

1 hour ago

Microsoft Ends Projects With Wicresoft In China

Some 2,000 support staff reportedly laid off as Microsoft ends China outsourcing deal with its…

2 hours ago

Singapore Banks Hit By Ransomware Data Breach

DBS, Bank of China Singapore say customer data compromised after printing services supplier hit by…

2 hours ago

Court Rejects UK Government Bid For Secrecy On Apple Case

UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal ends secrecy around Apple appeal of government order to provide access…

14 hours ago