Want to Avoid GCHQ Snooping? It’s As Simple As Using Skype

The government has come under heavy fire this week for its overbearing proposed surveillance legislation, which will see email communications and website visits monitored. Whilst GCHQ won’t be given a licence to view the actual content end users see, the update to the law still amounts to a seemingly egregious piece of privacy invasion.

But privacy is not the only thing that makes these measures absurd. What makes them truly crazy, is how easy it is to avoid detection on the Internet. Indeed, it dawned on me during a briefing with Skype last night that just using the Microsoft-owned voice and videoconferencing service would help people cover their tracks.

Anonymity via Skype

It all lies in the way Skype works. Skype itself doesn’t actually hold any of its customers’ communications data. None of its servers have any user interaction on them, nor do they keep records of conversations or details on who contacts who. It operates over a peer-to-peer system and the data sits on the client. Furthermore, all calls are anonymous from Skype’s point of view.

It appears that if the government wanted to find out what people were doing on Skype, it would not be able to get much at all from the VoIP company. It would need to get hold of customer devices and it would need a warrant to do that.

Of course, if Skype moves into doing more analytics work, as it indicated last night when it revealed it was going to be carrying out some big data projects, this would change things. But with the current architecture, Skype users should not have to worry about their communications details being intercepted by GCHQ.

Skype’s official line was rather more diplomatic than my own assertions: “We comply with legislation in all the countries in which we operate. This is a proposal and we have not had the opportunity to review it in depth,” the company said.

Hiding as Skype

There are numerous other ways to get around surveillance, one of the most innovative relating to Skype. Some clever computer scientists in the US have created a tool that disguises communications over the Tor anonymity service as Skype video calls. The SkypeMorph tool covers up the identifiable characteristics of data packets being sent over Tor, according to Ars Technica. Developed at the University of Waterloo, it effectively blends Tor user traffic into normal traffic. Tor was already good at cloaking internet activity, but now, with this add on, it’s even better.

There are more ways to remain unseen if the government legislation comes in, as Martino Corbelli, chief customer officer at Star, told TechWeekEurope. “For organisations or individuals with something to hide, it is relatively easy to dodge the reaches of this bill – by using pre-paid mobiles, foreign web-servers or existing systems that route traffic in such as way as to ensure user anonymity,” Corbelli said.

“The proposed bill would push terrorists and criminal gangs to use more secure and innovative methods of communication. Anti-crime and anti-terrorism agencies do not have the funding or the technical skills to start a technology war with criminal gangs or terrorists. We would be giving up our civil liberties just to make it harder to track real terrorists.”

When faced with such arguments, the government’s defence of these measures does not stand up. Any serious criminal organisation can leverage free technologies and avoid detection, making these extra measures wholly unnecessary. Outside of invading people’s privacy, they will do little to smash the “conspiracies and terrorist plots”, regardless of home secretary Theresa May’s polemics in the Sun yesterday.

May claimed similar use of data has already helped catch murderers like Ian Huntley and “gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.” Why does GCHQ need more powers then? The technology and available data is evidently useful enough already. The government’s excuses simply do not wash.

Think you know security? Test yourself with our quiz.

Thomas Brewster

Tom Brewster is TechWeek Europe's Security Correspondent. He has also been named BT Information Security Journalist of the Year in 2012 and 2013.

View Comments

  • Skype was very good, but unfortunately it is now owned by Microsoft, and from my experience and that of colleagues, Microsoft are not really interested in your privacy. If they - or that should say when they include analytics and revenue generating adverts in Skype, it will not be as private as it has been.

    • I think you are confusing Microsoft and Google. Microsoft are scrupulous with personal data, and dont use anything without making it very clear and getting your permission first.

  • I have always thought that technology will always be one (at least!) step ahead of government snooping and it is true.
    In the end, we Internet users will always win.

  • If this were true then Skype would be refused a telecoms license in all the countries in which it operates. Skype's protocol is proprietary, yes, and it operates over a kind of P2P topology, but Skype operators are able to intercept your calls and do so at request of law enforcement agencies.

  • Ok I will use Skype but there are other things that the government want to spy on, such as emails and web searches. Which are the best ones to use to avoid being arrested for looking up glycerine when making icing?

  • So these measure don't make sense against criminlas & competant terrorists ? Then its not those people who the measures are targeting.

    • The technology of skype may be peer to peer, then GCHQ will still be able to see who you are connecting between. Won't they be keeping logs at the ISPs of all your connections.

      I do agree though that technology of TOR and using VPNs from server abroad will allow you to sidestep much of the snooping GCHQ would do.

      As for writing letters, can anyone afford them these days.

    • @Garth Banks: there is no charge for Skype to Skpye calls, only for ones to telephone networks.

    • There are more ways of sending messages then using the internet. Letters are the most obvious one but mail to known operators can be intercepted. Readers of Frederick Forsythe and similar authors will have read of covert message transfers. They just take time and organisation.

  • But what if GCHQ had a massive 'shunt' across all the UK data lines? Say, down in Cornwall, what if it simply put all packets into big pot and then reconstructed the VoIP sessions having intercepted the setup by the RDV servers - what then?

  • Yes, but if the government were interested in crime-busting, the first thing it would have to do is bust itself.

    This is not about crime. It is about control, manipulation and surveillance of activism.

  • And when the Brussels mafia orders all this saved material to be handed over to the Eurocops, then what? Our weak-kneed, yellow-bellied politicians will fall over thmeselves to oblige.

    And it won't be long before all the data finds it way onto the open market.

Recent Posts

UK’s CMA Readies Cloud Sector “Behavioural” Remedies – Report

Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector

13 hours ago

Former Policy Boss At X Nick Pickles, Joins Sam Altman Venture

Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…

15 hours ago

Bitcoin Rises Above $96,000 Amid Trump Optimism

Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…

16 hours ago

FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Spared Prison

Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…

17 hours ago