Home Secretary Defends Phone And Internet Surveillance Proposals

Home secretary Theresa May has defended proposals which would allow GCHQ to track mobile communications and online activity without a warrant.

The legislation, which is expected to be announced in the Queen’s Speech in May, received criticism from various MPs and campaign groups yesterday who said the measures would infringe on rights.

Nationwide monitoring

Theresa May, writing in The Sun today, stood up for the changes, which would cost £2 billion over 10 years, by saying they were needed to “help the police stay one step ahead of criminals”.

“Looking at who a suspect talks to can lead the police to other criminals. Whole paedophile rings, criminal conspiracies and terrorist plots can then be smashed,” May said. “Data like this has already helped lock away murderer Ian Huntley. It helped catch the gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.”

“Last year, police smashed a major international child pornography website based in Lincolnshire. They then used internet data analysis to find other suspected paedophiles.”

She emphasised that GCHQ would not be creating a database of private information and would not be looking through the content of messages, arguing that the proposals were directly aimed at cracking down on criminals.

Fellow Conservative party member David Davis, also writing in The Sun, objected to this message however, saying the new legislation was unnecessary and would turn Britain into a “nation of suspects”.

“Whenever a government announces plans to snoop on British citizens, the argument is always the same – it needs the new law to stop terrorists,” Davis said. “But we already have a law which lets the secret services eavesdrop on suspected criminals and terrorists.”

“The new law does not focus on terrorists or criminals. It would instead allow civil servants to monitor every innocent, ordinary person in Britain, and all without a warrant.”

How much do you know about IT security? Test your knowledge with our quiz.

Jiten Karia

View Comments

  • Well Theresa May may feel it is all right to invade peoples privacy with new Laws,but I dont!
    I have never voted for labour before but I will be voting for them now, providing of course they don't have plans to do something similar.

  • If “Data like this has already helped lock away murderer Ian Huntley. It helped catch the gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.” then why do we need any changes, the systems in place now already seem to work?

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

2 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

2 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

2 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

3 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

3 days ago