Home Secretary Defends Phone And Internet Surveillance Proposals

Home secretary Theresa May has defended proposals which would allow GCHQ to track mobile communications and online activity without a warrant.

The legislation, which is expected to be announced in the Queen’s Speech in May, received criticism from various MPs and campaign groups yesterday who said the measures would infringe on rights.

Nationwide monitoring

Theresa May, writing in The Sun today, stood up for the changes, which would cost £2 billion over 10 years, by saying they were needed to “help the police stay one step ahead of criminals”.

“Looking at who a suspect talks to can lead the police to other criminals. Whole paedophile rings, criminal conspiracies and terrorist plots can then be smashed,” May said. “Data like this has already helped lock away murderer Ian Huntley. It helped catch the gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.”

“Last year, police smashed a major international child pornography website based in Lincolnshire. They then used internet data analysis to find other suspected paedophiles.”

She emphasised that GCHQ would not be creating a database of private information and would not be looking through the content of messages, arguing that the proposals were directly aimed at cracking down on criminals.

Fellow Conservative party member David Davis, also writing in The Sun, objected to this message however, saying the new legislation was unnecessary and would turn Britain into a “nation of suspects”.

“Whenever a government announces plans to snoop on British citizens, the argument is always the same – it needs the new law to stop terrorists,” Davis said. “But we already have a law which lets the secret services eavesdrop on suspected criminals and terrorists.”

“The new law does not focus on terrorists or criminals. It would instead allow civil servants to monitor every innocent, ordinary person in Britain, and all without a warrant.”

How much do you know about IT security? Test your knowledge with our quiz.

Jiten Karia

View Comments

  • Well Theresa May may feel it is all right to invade peoples privacy with new Laws,but I dont!
    I have never voted for labour before but I will be voting for them now, providing of course they don't have plans to do something similar.

  • If “Data like this has already helped lock away murderer Ian Huntley. It helped catch the gangland thugs who gunned down Rhys Jones.” then why do we need any changes, the systems in place now already seem to work?

Recent Posts

France Fines Apple Over Ad Tracking Feature

Apple fined 150m euros over App Tracking Transparency feature that it says abuses Apple's market…

7 hours ago

OpenAI To Release Open-Weight AI Model

OpenAI to release customisable open-weight model in coming months as it faces pressure from open-source…

7 hours ago

Samsung AI Fridge Creates Shopping Lists, Adjusts AC

Samsung's Bespoke AI-powered fridge monitors food to create shopping lists, displays TikTok videos, locates misplaced…

8 hours ago

Huawei Consumer Revenues Surge Amidst Smartphone Comeback

Huawei sees 38 percent jump in consumer revenues as its smartphone comeback continues to gather…

8 hours ago

China Approves First ‘Flying Car’ Licences

In world-first, China approves commercial flights for EHang autonomous passenger drone, paving way for imminent…

9 hours ago

Microsoft Shutters Shanghai Lab In Latest China Pullback

Microsoft closes down IoT and AI lab it operated in Shanghai tech district in latest…

9 hours ago