Categories: SecurityWorkspace

Hackers Bring Down Mastercard Site

Mastercard’s website was down for a period on Tuesday, in an apparent denial of service attack .

The sporadic loss of service appears to be due to “hacktivists” who previously attacked Mastercard in December, following the finance firm’s refusal to handle donations to the whistleblowing site WikiLeaks. At the time of writing, the site is running again.

Sporadic problems on Mastercard

The attack was from WikiLeaks supporters, according to a tweet claiming responsibility, from @ibomhacktivist:  “MasterCard.com DOWN!!!, thats what you get when you mess with @wikileaks @Anon_Central and the enter community of lulz loving individuals :D”

The hacking group Anonymous led the original strike on Mastercard, directing masses of meaningless traffic to block the site in a “denial of service” attack which also struck at PayPal and the Swiss bank PostFinance for the same reason.

“We’ve seen plenty of headlines over the past couple of months about high profile hacking incidents and unfortunately, the momentum doesn’t seem to be slowing,” said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at security firm Sophos.

These attacks are viewed by some as non-violent protests, but are illegal, Cluley said. British police have arrested five  suspects for possible involvement in the earlier attacks.

“This should be a wakeup call for us all when it comes to internet security,” said Cluley. “While there’s obviously a vast contrast between DDoS attacks and the bad guys looking to steal sensitive information for financial gain, the biggest concern is the attitude towards these attacks, with hackers portraying that it’s all a bit of fun.  Companies and computer users mustn’t sit back and laugh along, thinking that these attacks won’t affect them.”

The word “lulz” in @ibomhacktivist’s tweet is reference to the Lulzsec group which disbanded on Saturday, after a 50-day campaign of mischief which included publishing user passwords and personal details online. While some security experts regard Lulzsec’s activity as a useful wake-up call, others believe it overstepped the mark by stealing and exposing personal details.

Peter Judge

Peter Judge has been involved with tech B2B publishing in the UK for many years, working at Ziff-Davis, ZDNet, IDG and Reed. His main interests are networking security, mobility and cloud

Recent Posts

Baltic Sea Power Cable Severed In Latest Incident

Undersea internet and power cable in Baltic sea between Finland and Estonia suffers outage. Finland…

1 day ago

US Begins Investigation Into Legacy Chinese Chips

The Biden Administration has launched a last-minute investigation into older Chinese-made legacy semiconductors - weeks…

1 day ago

Iran Lifts Ban On WhatsApp, Google Play

State media reports the Iranian regime has lifted the ban on WhatsApp and Google Play,…

1 day ago

Spyware Maker NSO Group Found Liable In US Court

Landmark ruling finds NSO Group liable on hacking charges in US federal court, after Pegasus…

4 days ago

Microsoft Diversifying 365 Copilot Away From OpenAI

Microsoft reportedly adding internal and third-party AI models to enterprise 365 Copilot offering as it…

4 days ago

Albania Bans TikTok For One Year After Stabbing

Albania to ban access to TikTok for one year after schoolboy stabbed to death, as…

4 days ago