The environmental group Greenpeace has issued a report raising questions about Apple’s commitment to using 100 percent renewable energy sources to power its facilities, particularly a new data centre Apple opened in Maiden, North Carolina.
Greenpeace rescored Apple’s performance, updating an April analysis of the clean energy performance of Apple and several other companies, all of which have some or all of their operations based in the cloud. The other ranked companies range from Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Microsoft to Facebook, Twitter and Google.
“Despite a welcome commitment by Apple in May that its data centres will be coal-free and powered by 100 percent renewable energy, the analysis reveals that Apple still lacks a plan that outlines a realistic path to eliminate its reliance on coal to power its iCloud,” Greenpeace stated on 12 July.
A large section of Apple’s own website is devoted to its environmental commitment and practices. On it, Apple states four of its data centres–in Austin, Texas, Sacramento, California, Munich, Germany, and Cork, Ireland – are 100 percent powered by renewable energy.
As to the North Carolina data centre, Apple has stated: “Our goal is to meet the needs of the Maiden facility using 100 percent renewable energy by the end of 2012… We have major projects under way to achieve this goal – including building the nation’s largest private solar arrays and building the largest operating non-utility fuel cell installation.”
But Greenpeace is skeptical that Apple can reach that goal and noted that Duke Energy, the utility that serves North Carolina, still relies mostly on coal and nuclear power for electrical generation and that only 4 percent of its generating capacity will come from renewables by 2030.
Greenpeace is calling on Apple to use renewable electricity from onsite generation to directly power its North Carolina facility and use grid power from Duke Energy only for backup.
It also is urging Apple to use biogas to directly power fuel cells at the Maiden data centre and to “invest directly in new renewable energy generation in North Carolina rather than buying renewable credits to ‘green’ Duke Energy’s dirty electricity”.
The group also wants Apple to use its leverage as a major Duke Energy customer to get the utility to use more renewable energy sources and to make access to renewable energy sources a top priority in siting future Apple data centres.
The Greenpeace report assigns each company studied an overall Clean Energy Index, expressed as a percentage, and records the use of coal and nuclear sources for the electricity it consumes. It also grades companies on the transparency of their energy use disclosures, how they site their infrastructure, their energy efficiency and greenhouse gas mitigation, their use of renewables and their clean energy advocacy.
Apple actually improved some of its performance in the July rescoring of the April report. Its Clean Energy Index improved to 22.6 percent from 15.3 percent, its use of coal-generated electricity fell to 33.5 percent from 55.1 percent and its use of nuclear fell to 11.6 percent from 27.8 percent.
Greenpeace says it’s next going to rescore the Clean Energy Index for Amazon and Microsoft later this year.
Do you know the secrets of Wi-Fi? Take our quiz.
OpenAI reportedly begins early talks with California attorney general over complex transition from nonprofit to…
European Commission says it will review Apple's iPad compliance with DMA rules as it seeks…
James Dyson delivers most high-profile criticism so far of Labour's first Budget that raises £40bn…
Nvidia, Meta bring cases before US Supreme Court this month seeking tighter limits on investors'…
Nvidia to replace Intel this week on Dow Jones Industrial Average after years of turmoil…
Joby Aviation and Toyota Motor complete demonstration flight in Shizuoka as companies prepare to bring…
View Comments
FYI
Federal Lawsuit Regarding Bloom Energy
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/21/884-May-Be-Bloom-Energys-Fatal-Number-Fuel-Cell-Efficiency-Federal-State-Tax-Credits
"Buried deep in the permit application, in Table 1 on page 161 of a 163-page application, was the number 884. On that page, under penalty of perjury, Bloom officially told the world that its energy servers emit 884 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour."
Also buried on page 161 of the permit application is a Table 2 notation that says these 235 “clean” servers would emit 22.56 pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) per day. But Delaware, like other states, regulates VOC emissions at far lower levels (Maryland, for instance, regulates boat repair shops that emit more than 15 pounds per day). Moreover, if the same amount of power had been generated by combined cycle gas turbines, only 0.249 pounds of VOCs would be emitted daily. That’s 90 times less pollution!
To top it off, because of the Bloom servers’ low efficiency and high capital cost, Delaware citizens will pay Bloom over $200 per megawatt hour of power delivered to their electricity transmission grid. But in January 2012, the U.S. Energy Information Agency said the projected “levelized” cost of electricity over the next 30 years from advanced gas-fired combined cycle power stations is $65.50 per MWH.