Google had faced potential legal action from a group of Gmail users over its controversial scanning practices of Gmail messages.
But now disgruntled users will not be able to fight the search giant as a group in a class-action lawsuit. Instead, they’ll have to take Google on individually if they want to sue over the email scanning done by the company.
That was the ruling from California US District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose on 18 March, as Koh denied a request by prospective plaintiffs to file a class-action suit as a unified group, which would have given them more leverage to battle Google over the practice, according to a 19 March report by Bloomberg News.
The amount at stake could have reached into the trillions of dollars if, as the plaintiffs argued, each person was eligible for damages of $100 (£61) a day for violations of federal wiretap law.
“Koh ruled that the proposed classes of people in the Google case were not “sufficiently cohesive,” and didn’t necessarily identify “whether the proposed class members consented to the alleged interceptions,” Bloomberg
A Google spokesman told Bloomberg in a statement that the company has “been upfront about Gmail’s automated processing, which allows us to provide security and spam protection, tailored ads, and other great features like Priority Inbox.”
The controversy in this case, however, may not be over for Google. The company previously defeated a similar bid for class-action status in a related case in San Rafael, California, but the plaintiffs then filed an amended version of their complaint in February 2014, according to the story.
Google continues to face government and citizen concerns over its data privacy policies around the globe, with no end in sight to the scenarios that are involved.
In January 2014, Google was hit with a$204,200 (£123,667) fine by France’s National Commission for Computing and Civil Liberties (CNIL) in connection with changes Google made to its data policies in 2012 that continue to be in conflict with the French Data Protection Act, according to an earlier eWEEK report. The fine was the highest financial penalty assessed so far by the French data protection agency.
Are you a pedant on privacy issues? Try our quiz!
Originally published on eWeek.
Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…
Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…
Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…
Welcome to Silicon In Focus Podcast: Tech in 2025! Join Steven Webb, UK Chief Technology…
European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…
San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…