Following pressure from government, Google is improving the tools it uses to fight distribution of child pornography online.
Since 2008, the search engine has been tagging each of the offending images it indexed with a unique code, which made it easier to track such material across the Web and remove it.
Now, Google will begin collecting these codes into a cross-industry database, to help companies, police and charities to better collaborate on detecting and removing illegal content and punish those responsible.
“It is critical that we take action as a community – as concerned parents, guardians, teachers and companies – to help combat this problem,” wrote Jacquelline Fuller, director of Google Giving.
Earlier this month, Prime Minister David Cameron had called upon Internet companies, including Google, to take “more action” against online child abuse imagery. He said the industry needs to take steps beyond existing efforts, such as those of the Internet Watch Foundation, an organisation which seeks out and reports illegal content on the Internet.
Google has been fighting child pornography since 2006, when it teamed up with other tech companies in order to develop tools to better detect and remove illegal content. This partnership resulted in an image “hashing” technology, introduced in 2008, which not only identifies the offending image, but also its duplicates.
An important feature of this system is it avoids the need for human verification, which means no person will have the unenviable job of looking at some of the worst things on the Internet.
According to Google, in 2011, the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), an organisation headquartered in the US and accessible in 60 countries, received reports of 17.3 million images and videos of suspected child abuse. There are indications that this number has grown considerably since 2007.
The new image tagging and cataloguing technology is expected to encourage international cooperation, making it easy to track child abuse across borders.
Google has also pledged $5 million (£3.2m) to finance child protection charities. The company will spend $2 million to set up the Child Protection Technology Fund, and an undisclosed amount of money will go on sponsoring NCMEC. Following Cameron’s announcement, Google donated £1m to the Internet Watch Foundation – almost enough money to run the charity for a year.
“We’re in the business of making information widely available, but there’s certain ‘information’ that should never be created or found. We can do a lot to ensure it’s not available online – and that when people try to share this disgusting content they are caught and prosecuted,” wrote Fuller.
Meanwhile, in the UK, ISPs will have to introduce default pornography filters by 2014, with customers able to opt out if they so desire.
Mobile network operators have been offering “on by default” pornography filters for several years, but these measures have been criticised by freedom of speech campaigners since they frequently block legitimate websites.
Despite this, according to TalkTalk, home broadband customers actually welcome default porn filters. Since March 2012, the company has been offering customers a choice whether to use a ‘HomeSafe’ filter or not when they activate their broadband. The company said roughly a third of its customers have implemented the feature.
What do you do when tech fails? Take our quiz!
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
View Comments
The real story here is not about child abuse, but about the ability of companies/governments to spy on all communications, if they can tag what is onsidered 'offending' images what else is being tagged and tracked without our knowledge. They may even be breaking the law themselves in doing so.
There is also the worry of false positives and worse false negatives.
There are better ways to rid the net of child abuse and that just requires international co-operation and some positive action by the police to follow the money and IP addresses
If you have an ISP porn filter on by definition every web site you visit is being monitored and analysed (unless its just a black list - but that makes it pointless). Once that's in place its easy for government to then add the ability to track your every e-movement, taste, political persuasion - not that they would ever be tempted of course!
Whatever happened to teaching your kids right from wrong?