Using his Business Insider blog operations as an example, Henry Blodget made a compelling argument as to why Google should pump more money into improving Google Apps.
Blodget’s predicament goes like this:
Of course, because we are occasionally e-mailed Microsoft Office files and need to be able to open them, and because we occasionally need to do things that Microsoft Office apps do well and Google Apps don’t, we still keep copies of Microsoft Office on most of our machines. Thus, we still pay Microsoft fat license fees for Office applications, even though we rarely use them. Hopefully, someday, we’ll stop getting emailed Office files and Google Apps will get better, and we’ll just be able to drop Office altogether.
Of course, one of the major knocks on Google Apps has always been weaker spreadsheet and presentation functionality than Microsoft Office’s Excel and PowerPoint apps. It certainly hasn’t been Gmail or Docs, which are full-bodied enough for most folks.
Interestingly, Google overhauled the editors in Google Apps in April 2010, but Blodget and others still find them wanting. Perhaps another rewrite, with full HTML5, will solve this issue?
While it might be tempting to think Blodget’s scenario is an edge case – that shops should either go all Microsoft Office (or Office 365) or Google Apps – it doesn’t work like that and likely won’t for a long time.
Consider that Google jsut lost 13,000 out of the 30,000 seats for its Los Angeles contract because the Los Angeles Police Department chose to remain on Novell GroupWise, citing security issues with Google’s cloud computing model.
Also, while Google Apps for Education just secured University of California at Berkeley for 2012, the school still uses Microsoft Office, Windows, Projects and Visio.
It’s hard to be all things to all people; it is hard just to duplicate functionality baked into a productivity suite that goes back nearly two decades. You can’t just do that overnight.
Google Apps will be five next month, and while it’s got more advanced faster than Microsoft advanced Office, it’s still not the complete answer.
Google has argued that most end users, even power users, don’t want the 300-something features in the Office suite that Microsoft touts.
Maybe not, but many power users who want to move to the cloud certainly want better spreadsheet and presentation functionality than Google Apps has to offer at present.
I asked Google, which rarely misses an opportunity to defend Google Apps, for comment. The company declined, which makes me think that Apps might be getting some fine-tuning we don’t yet know about beyond the well-publicised integration with Google+.
It’s been two years since the last major Apps overhaul, so keep an eye out this year.
New chapter for famous name from Internet's early days, Napster, has been acquired and will…
Solving not-spots? Ofcom proposal to make UK the first European country to allow ordinary smartphones…
Pioneering robotaxi service from Alphabet's Waymo to go live in Washington DC next year, as…
Dozens of Chinese firms added to US export blacklist, in order to hamper Beijing's AI…
Chinese rival BYD overtakes global revenues of Elon Musk's Tesla, as record number of Tesla…
Messaging app Signal in the headlines after a journalist was invited to a top secret…
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="127px" width="185px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)
View Comments
There is a simple solution for him. Use LibreOffice (the re-incarnation of OpenOffice.org) which is 100% free, open source and compatable with Microsoft Office (including Excel). In my personal experience, it loads faster, work just as well and is cross platform so it opens businesses up to using OSX and Linux if they so choose.