News just in – climate change is real. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reiterated and restated the news that human activity is warming the planet. That’s the bad news.
The worse news is that denialism is alive and well, and there’s no sign of actual activity to prevent the catastrophe.
Two hundred and nine lead authors have chewed through the evidence, and produced a summary and a full report for the IPCC, both of which conclude that we are more sure than ever that man-made climate change is happening.
Mean sea levels have definitely risen over last two hundred years, and the global temperature is going up. There is no serious scientist that disputes this.
It’s important that this report is as reliable as possible – it’s the basis for negotiations between now and the COP21 Climate Summit in Paris in 2015, where negotiators hope to get the world’s nations to agree a new Climate Change Treaty that might combat the effect.
Does this sound familiar? in 2007, there was a fresh statement of climate science, and in 2009 the world’s leaders went to the Climate Summit in Copenhagen hoping to thrash out a more binding treaty than the Kyoto Protocol. They failed.
A massive backlash from climate change deniers helped scupper the talks, Anyone with an axe to grind seized on any hint of error or equivocation in the report. And then there was the ridiculous hoo-ha about the so-called “Climategate” emails stolen from the University of East Anglia.
This time round, we’ve already heard from the ludicrous Benny Peiser, and the slipshod Global Warming Policy Foundation. Denialists use logic so convoluted that they posit a global conspiracy of climate scientists, all eager to get their hands on science grants from governments – and yet obfuscate the rather obvious links between denialists and the oil and gas industry.
It’s a conspiracy, say the dinosaurs, using poor science which is either blatantly paid for by the oil and gas industries, or comes from bodies (like the GWPF) which refuse to reveal the sources of their funding, to attack public academics. No really – who’s conspiring?
Newspapers are blatantly mis-reporting the story. The world’s temperature is rising more slowly – so the British Daily Express’s headline says it is “cooling”. Global temperatures are higher than ever.
Australia has elected a climate-denying buffoon (Tony Abbott) as its Prime Minister, Britain has an environment secretary (Owen Paterson) who says he is a sceptic.
You can dismiss those as some sort of exceptions – the world having a Tea Party moment – but the US came closer than I like to picking a science-denying president.
And anyway, who needs the crazies, when you look at the actual policies of the people in power? We might as well have denialists in charge.
Thanks to our fears of recession, the whole world seems to be focused on getting coal, oil and gas out of the ground as quickly as possible. The discussion about fracking doesn’t mention the destruction of our climate: it’s all about whether the technique is cost effective, whether it might cause damage to swathes of countryside, and how influential the voters are who live there.
The scene is set for a depressing couple of years till the Paris Summit.
The scientists really have done a bang-up job. Please, can someone convince me that the rest of us will actually make a sensible response to the data?
A version of this article appeared on Green Data Center News
Do you know Green IT and energy consumption? Try our quiz!
Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…
Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…
Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…
Welcome to Silicon In Focus Podcast: Tech in 2025! Join Steven Webb, UK Chief Technology…
European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…
San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…
View Comments
Hi,
The title President of Australia doesn't exist. Unfortunately Tony Abbott is the Prime Minister of Australia.
sorry! An embarrassing error as we share the same Head of State...
Further, you misspell Benny Peiser's name - there's no "z" in it.
Worse, though, is your enslavement to the "denier" talking point. Skeptic scientists have never 'denied' global warming, they've instead put out reports ( http://climatechangereconsidered.org/ccr-2013/ ) citing peer-reviewed science journal-published papers in order to make the claim that the IPCC has not conclusively made its case that human-induced greenhouse gases are the primary drivers of global warming.
Equally bad is your enslavement to the notion about fossil fuel industry money tainting the credibility of skeptic scientists. Without any physical evidence proving the money they received - whatever paltry amount that may be - came with an explicit directive to fabricate false science papers, reports or viewpoints, you have nothing more than donations given because the donors like what they hear. Hardly different than when Greenpeace commissioned IPCC Vice Chair Jean-Pascal van Ypersele to write a paper. He admitted to the event and said the association had no effect over what he wrote.
Thank you.
The Climate Change Reconsidered project is indeed one of the most polished bits of skeptic/denier material. However, it has been pretty thoroughly debunked, and itself is funded by organisations who are known to be backed by the likes of Exxon and the Kochs.
Here's a site funded by PayPal
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
Peter
"... itself is funded by organisations who are known to be backed by the likes of Exxon..."
Appears you did not comprehend what I said in my prior comment's 2nd paragraph.
To repeat: Without any physical evidence proving the money they received – whatever paltry amount that may be – came with an explicit directive to fabricate false science papers, reports or viewpoints... You. Have. Nothing.
The dismissal of skeptics via that kind of guilt-by-association is anti-intellectual, in other words. There is no logic to it.
I am fully aware of the SkepticScience site, and their source of funding is irrelevant to what they put out, if that funding has no influence over their material. But were you aware the proprietor of that site was caught red-handed deleting material that did not conform to his opinions about AGW? http://nigguraths.wordpress.com/2011/10/10/skepticalscience-rewriting-history/