Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have reached a settlement over charges the social networking giant engaged in deceptive behaviour when it changed its users’ privacy settings without permission.
The FTC settlement bars the social networking site from making any “further deceptive privacy claims” and requires Facebook to get explicit approval from users before changing how data is shared, the FTC announced. Facebook must provide “clear and prominent notice” before data is shared, and establish a comprehensive privacy programme that is subject to a third-party audit within 180 days and every two years for the next 20 years.
While Facebook does not have to pay any penalties at the moment, it faces fines of up to $16,000 (£10,263) per day for violating the terms, going forward.
“Facebook is obligated to keep the promises about privacy that it makes to its hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz.
The FTC voted to accept the proposed settlement in a 4-0 vote. The agreement is subject to public comment for 30 days, after which the commission would vote to finalise the settlement. The settlement is also a “consent agreement” and does not “constitute an admission by the respondent that the law has been violated”, according to the FTC.
Most of the concerns presented to the FTC in this inquiry have long since been resolved satisfactorily, according to Daniel Castro, senior analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.
“Rather than impose heavy-handed regulations or engage in expensive and unproductive litigation, policymakers should continue to work in partnership with the private sector to balance privacy with innovation,” Castro said.
The FTC charged Facebook after investigating the company in response to a complaint filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Centre (Epic), a Washington-based advocacy group on 17 December, 2009. Facebook had changed its default privacy settings in order to provide users with a “simpler model for privacy control”, Mark Zuckerberg (pictured), Facebook founder and CEO, said at the time.
However, Epic alleged in its complaint that consumers were harmed when it turned out the changes had resulted Facebook’s disclosing “personal information to third parties that was previously not available”, such as making accessible the profiles of users who had deactivated or deleted their accounts.
Page: 1 2
Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…
Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…
Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…
Welcome to Silicon In Focus Podcast: Tech in 2025! Join Steven Webb, UK Chief Technology…
European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…
San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…