Categories: RegulationWorkspace

Facebook To Review Content Policies Amidst Protests

Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has said the company will review content policies that have been widely criticised from within and outside of the company, amidst protests over racial inequalities and police brutality.

Zuckerberg, who holds a controlling stake in the company, did not promise specific policy changes.

His remarks came in response to a walk-out by staff last week, followed later in the week by a meeting in which Zuckerberg faced questions from angry employees.

He said Facebook would review the company’s policies on “threats of state use of force”, following his decision that a controversial post by US president Donald Trump did not violate policies.

Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook’s F8 developer conference in 2018. Credit: Facebook

‘Amendments’

“We’re going to review our policies allowing discussion and threats of state use of force to see if there are any amendments we should adopt,” Zuckerberg wrote.

He said the review would specifically address “instances of excessive use of police or state force” and “when a country has ongoing civil unrest or violent conflicts”.

Twitter attached a warning to Trump’s post on its platform for “glorifying violence” and has also recently fact-checked other Trump posts.

Currently, Facebook’s policy is to either leave posts up or take them down, but Zuckerberg said the review would look into other “potential options for handling violating or partially-violating content”.

Transparency

He said Facebook would also be more transparent about its decision-making on taking down posts, would review policies on posts that could cause voter suppression and would look to build software that would advance racial justice.

In connection with voter suppression, Zuckerberg specifically mentioned potential misinformation, something Twitter also addressed in its fact-checks of some Trump posts.

He said he personally thinks the company’s current policy on removing posts that incite violence – rather than labelling them as Twitter did – is “principled and reasonable”.

“But I also respect a lot of the people who think there may be better alternatives, so I want to make sure we hear all those ideas,” Zuckerberg wrote.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Northvolt Mulls US Bankruptcy Protection – Report

Troubled battery maker Northvolt reportedly considers Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States as…

2 days ago

FTC Plans Investigation Into Microsoft Cloud Business – Report

Microsoft's cloud business practices are reportedly facing a potential anti-competitive investigation by the FTC

2 days ago

Programmer Sentenced To Five Years In Prison For Bitcoin Laundering

Ilya Lichtenstein sentenced to five years in prison for hacking into a virtual currency exchange…

2 days ago

Hate Speech Watchdog CCDH To Quit Musk’s X

Target for Elon Musk's lawsuit, hate speech watchdog CCDH, announces its decision to quit X…

3 days ago

Meta Fined €798m Over Alleged Facebook Marketplace Violations

Antitrust penalty. European Commission fines Meta a hefty €798m ($843m) for tying Facebook Marketplace to…

3 days ago

Elon Musk Rebuked By Italian President Over Migration Tweets

Elon Musk continues to provoke the ire of various leaders around the world with his…

3 days ago