Facebook Rebuffs Critics’ Six Point Plan

Priivacy groups campaigning about Facebookmar’s attitude to its users’ information have stepped up the pressure, but the company has refuted six-point plan proposed by the campaigners.

In an open letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (PDF), privacy advocates released a six-point plan for the social network to give users more control over the sharing of their information.

Facebook rejects plans

For the moment, Facebook does not appear to be budging, wth founder Mark Zuckerberg defending the company and calling for balance but said it was open to continuing a dialogue about privacy. Zuckerberg has faced prolonged criticism for many months over an explicit attitude that privacy norms have changed.

Facebook received widespread praise from users around the world and the privacy community last month for introducing simpler and more powerful controls for sharing personal information,” Facebook spokesperson Andrew Noyes told eWEEK. “We plan to continue to make control easy and effective for all the people who use our service and will continue to engage these groups and others in a constructive dialogue about these important issues.”

In the letter, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Northern California and several other groups acknowledged Facebook’s recent improvements, but contended that additional steps are needed to “demonstrate [Facebook’s] commitment to the principle of giving users control over how and with whom they share.”

Chief among the concerns aired in the letter was what the groups called the “app gap,” which the letter said needs to be addressed by “empowering users to decide exactly which applications can access their personal information.”

Expanding on this term, the letter said, “Facebook’s latest changes allow users a ‘nuclear option’ to opt out of applications entirely. While this is an important setting, it is not adequate for meaningful control. Facebook users should also have the option to choose to share information only with specific applications.”

Point-by-point response

In a point-by-point response to the groups’ letter, Noyes countered that a plan for a new data permission model was announced in summer 2009, and “the product is scheduled to launch to all developers in the coming weeks.”

The groups also asked Facebook to, “Make ‘instant personalisation’ opt-in by default.” The feature was at the centre of the firestorm of controversy a few weeks ago, as concerns were raised regarding user information being shared withthird-party sites.

Page: 1 2

Brian Prince eWEEK USA 2014. Ziff Davis Enterprise Inc. All Rights Reserved

Share
Published by
Brian Prince eWEEK USA 2014. Ziff Davis Enterprise Inc. All Rights Reserved
Tags: Facebook

Recent Posts

Is the Digital Transformation of Businesses Complete?

Digital transformation is an ongoing journey, requiring continuous adaptation, strong leadership, and skilled talent to…

20 hours ago

Craig Wright Faces Contempt Claim Over Bitcoin Lawsuit

Australian computer scientist faces contempt-of-court claim after suing Jack Dorsey's Block and Bitcoin Core developers…

21 hours ago

OpenAI Adds ChatGPT Search Features

OpenAI's ChatGPT gets search features, putting it in direct competition with Microsoft and Google, amidst…

21 hours ago

Google Maps Steers Into Local Information With AI Chat

New Google Maps allows users to ask for detailed information on local spots, adds AI-summarised…

22 hours ago

Huawei Sees Sales Surge, But Profits Fall

US-sanctioned Huawei sees sales surge in first three quarters of 2024 on domestic smartphone popularity,…

22 hours ago

Apple Posts China Sales Decline, Ramping Pressure On AI Strategy

Apple posts slight decline in China sales for fourth quarter, as Tim Cook negotiates to…

23 hours ago