Brussels Aims To Regulate Online Giants’ ‘Harmful’ Business Practices

The European Commission is to publish draft regulations on Thursday that would target “harmful” business practices employed by companies such as Google, Apple and Amazon in their relations with the small companies and vendors for whom they act as online intermediaries.

The regulations were initially developed for app stores, but the Commission later expanded them to include other kinds of intermediaries, including search engines and hotel booking services such as Booking.com.

The “platforms to business” proposal is the first time the Commission has sought to regulate large tech companies business operations, having opted for self-regulation in other areas.

The EU’s plans would allow smaller companies to take collective legal action on “online intermediation services” through industry groups or non-profit organisations. Such action is currently only available to consumers in Europe.

The regulations take aim at Apple and other online giants

Collective redress

Collective lawsuits would only be available if complaints were not resolved in-house or through a mediation system.

The rules take aim at unfair practices such as a change in terms and conditions without explanation or notice, or de-listing or demoting a service in an app store or search engine rankings without a clear justification.

Google and other search engines would be required to provide businesses with a general picture of how their ranking algorithms work and explain whether companies can pay to achieve higher rankings.

“These legal obligations should ensure that the business users of online intermediation services are given appropriate transparency as well as effective redress possibilities throughout the union,” says the proposed text. Several news agencies have reported on the EU’s plans.

Transparency

The rules would require intermediaries with more than 50 staff to have internal complaint departments. Companies would also be encouraged to hire independent mediators to handle out-of-court settlements and to pay most of the costs for setting up the system.

Tech companies have said the system threatens saddling them with hefty administrative costs and opens them to extended legal action.

“Collective redress could open a floodgate of unnecessary litigation while mechanisms already exist to resolve problems in a much more time- and cost-effective way,” Jakob Kucharczyk of the Computer & Communications Industry Association told the Financial Times.

He said platforms already have many incentives to respond to their business users’ needs and as such the proposed system was “disproportionate”.

The European Commission said in the proposed text it wants to set up a “fair, predictable and ultimately trusted legal environment”.

The plans must be approved by the European Parliament and EU member states before becoming law.

Why not test your knowledge of European tech pioneers and the EU’s contribution to the industry? Try our quiz!

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

2 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

2 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

2 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

3 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

3 days ago