Dutch Refuse Apple Immediate Ban On Samsung Tab

Samsung showed off its defence against Apple’s accusation that the iPad design was copied and renamed the Galaxy Tab. The iPhone maker was in a European court against Samsung for the second time this week seeking a ban on sales of the Samsung tablet pending a full court hearing later in the year.

For Samsung it was its first court appearance because it was not invited to the earlier hearing. Without opposition, Apple succeeded in persuading the German court to grant an injunction banning the sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 across all European Union countries. In the UK, Vodafone has already complied with the ruling and withdrawn the tablet from sale but still supplies the seven-inch version.

Samsung Gains Dutch Courage

For some reason, the Netherlands was not included in the ban. It has been suggested that this is because Apple brought the action in Holland’s The Hague courts before it applied to the German authorities.

For its day in court, Samsung’s legal team pointed out that there are a number of electronic devices that are flat, rectangles with curved corners and large screens. It cited the numerous digital photo frames on sale, such as the black Samsung SPF107H 10 inch Digital Photo Frame which was first stocked by Amazon in 2009 – so it actually pre-dates Apple’s design. They may also have used Microsoft’s Tablet PC designs from HP and others which appeared in 2002 – but that may be asking for an injunction from Seattle.

Knight Ridder Tablet 1994

Apple’s broad interpretation of design is a result of its function, the South Korean company said. Samsung’s team actually took along twenty alleged “prior art” examples for the court, including a 1994 “Knight-Ridder” tablet concept which can be viewed on YouTube.

In turn, Apple’s attorneys revealed market research that showed 80 percent of the people asked thought the iPad and Galaxy Tab were “identical” or “similar in general impression”.

Dismissing the Apple argument on the grounds of questionable methodology, the judge refused to give an immediate ruling. He postponed any decision until September 15, adding that if an injunction was granted it would not come into force before October 13.

Eric Doyle, ChannelBiz

Eric is a veteran British tech journalist, currently editing ChannelBiz for NetMediaEurope. With expertise in security, the channel, and Britain's startup culture, through his TechBritannia initiative

View Comments

Recent Posts

Australia Rejects Elon Musk Claim About Social Media Ban For Under-16s

Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…

45 mins ago

Northvolt Files For Bankruptcy Protection In US

Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…

2 hours ago

UK’s CMA Readies Cloud Sector “Behavioural” Remedies – Report

Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector

18 hours ago

Former Policy Boss At X Nick Pickles, Joins Sam Altman Venture

Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…

20 hours ago

Bitcoin Rises Above $96,000 Amid Trump Optimism

Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…

22 hours ago

FTX Co-Founder Gary Wang Spared Prison

Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…

22 hours ago