The implementation of anti-piracy measures included in the UK’s Digital Economy Act could be delayed until next year, due to wide-scale opposition from within the industry.
The controversial Act, which was rushed through parliament in the closing days of the previous government, is to face a judicial review on Wednesday. The UK’s two largest Internet service providers, BT and TalkTalk, will aim to block the Act, on the grounds that it infringes users’ “basic rights and freedoms”.
If their challenge is successful the review process could take until spring 2012.
The Digital Economy Act (DEA) requires ISPs to impose an escalating series of sanctions on persistent file-sharers, starting with sending letters to illegal downloaders and culminating in slowing down the connection speed of offenders or temporarily suspending their connections.
BT and TalkTalk are long-term opponents of the DEA, which effectively forces ISPs to “police” their own customers. The service providers launched their legal challenge in July last year, and were granted a judicial review in November.
“Innocent broadband customers will suffer and citizens will have their privacy invaded. We think the previous government’s rushed approach resulted in flawed legislation,” said TalkTalk Group chairman Charles Dunstone at the time. “That’s why we need a judicial review by the High Court as quickly as possible before lots of money is spent on implementation.”
The UK media regulator Ofcom is also currently reviewing whether the DEA’s controversial powers to block sites that share copyright material are workable. The move follows opposition to the act during the government’s recent ‘Your Freedom’ consultation.
Meanwhile, a new report (pdf) from the London School of Economics and Political Science claims that the DEA gets the balance between copyright enforcement and innovation wrong, and that the use of peer-to-peer technology should be encouraged to promote innovative applications.
“The DEA has given too much consideration to the interests of copyright holders, while ignoring other stakeholders such as users, ISPs, and new players in the creative industry,” said co-author of the report, Bingchun Meng. “I hope the Judicial Review will make the government reconsider its approach toward file-sharing.”
A spokesman for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport told The Telegraph that the government has gained EU approval for the Act’s cost-sharing arrangements – which put 75 percent of the burden on copyright holders and 25 percent on broadband providers – but secondary legislation is still needed to set out how the system will be paid for and how the appeals process will work.
Meanwhile, Julian Huppert, the Liberal Democrat MP for Cambridge, has reportedly been commissioned to come up with an alternative approach to tackling Internet piracy, which the government says costs creative industries £400 million per year.
Fourth quarter results beat Wall Street expectations, as overall sales rise 6 percent, but EU…
Hate speech non-profit that defeated Elon Musk's lawsuit, warns X's Community Notes is failing to…
Good luck. Russia demands Google pay a fine worth more than the world's total GDP,…
Google Cloud signs up Spotify, Paramount Global as early customers of its first ARM-based cloud…
Facebook parent Meta warns of 'significant acceleration' in expenditures on AI infrastructure as revenue, profits…
Microsoft says Azure cloud revenues up 33 percent for September quarter as capital expenditures surge…
View Comments
At CIVIC we agree with the bulk of what is in the report. Peer to Peer technology has potential for the public sector and the wider community too, and putting a brake on development in this area would be counter productive for the public good.
We need a technical answer to a technical problem here - digital rights management being the obvious one for copyright holders.