Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft Boost Data Request Disclosure Rules

A number of major US technology companies, including Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft, are changing their policies to expand the cases in which they will automatically notify users of data requests from the government.

The changes, reported by The Washington Post, are in response to the revelations of large-scale data collection activities by the National Security Administration (NSA), and IT companies’ role in those activities. The public controversy over this issue has led companies to seek ways of reassuring customers over the privacy of their data.

Routine notification

The policy changes will not, however, affect the data requests used by the NSA or those used by the FBI in national security investigations, both of which carry binding gag orders.

In general, the changes mean that these companies will seek to automatically notify users of a government request for data such as email, unless specifically gagged.

The shift means that routine data requests, such as those covered by subpoenas, could become more difficult for law-enforcement bodies, since they will now run the risk that the person targeted by the request could destroy data before it can be collected. Law-enforcement bodies may now be obliged to seek measures with more stringent standards, such as search warrants, or to go to a judge to seek a gag request.

Yahoo has had a policy on routinely notifying users of data requests since July, and Twitter has had such a request in place for several years.

Google, which already notified users of some requests, updated its policy last week to add details of the few situations in which notification is withheld, such as if there is an imminent risk of physical harm to a potential crime victim.

Policy changes

Apple, Facebook and Microsoft are also planning imminent policy changes to expand the cases in which they notify users, according to the Post’s report.

The US Justice Department said in a statement that the companies’ new policies weaken the ability of law enforcement bodies to protect potential crime victims.

“These risks of endangering life, risking destruction of evidence, or allowing suspects to flee or intimidate witnesses are not merely hypothetical, but unfortunately routine,” said a Justice Department spokesman.

The Electronic Privacy Information Centre (EPIC) applauded the changes. “It could slow the investigative process down,” Marc Rotenberg, the group’s executive director, told The Wall Street Journal. “But that’s the point.”

Are you a security pro? Try our quiz!

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

3 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

3 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

3 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

4 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

4 days ago