Gordon Brown has set out plans to deliver superfast broadband to every home in the UK, in a move that he claims could slash billions of pounds from public service costs and create more than a quarter of a million jobs. But could such a scheme really help to deliver Brown’s vision of Britain as “the leading superfast broadband digital power”?
Late last year, a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found that the UK was distinctly average when it came to broadband penetration. Out of the 30 OECD members, Britain was placed 13th, with 28.9 broadband subscribers per 100 population.
The study also found that while 61.5 percent of British households had access to a broadband service, the country was lagging behind other countries when it came to download speeds. The UK’s average advertised download speed is 10.7 Mbps, compared to average speeds of 51 Mbps in France, 80.8 Mbps in South Korea and 92.8 Mbps in Japan.
“The Internet is the most powerful potential source of enlightenment ever created,” Dr Hamadoun Toure, secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), told BBC News. He said that governments must regard the Internet as basic infrastructure – just like roads, waste and water. “We have entered the knowledge society and everyone must have access to participate,” he said. Internet access is already a legal right in Finland and Spain.
In many ways Gordon Brown’s digital strategy responds to this sentiment. In his speech he expressed the view that “the world available to those with superfast broadband will be unimaginably richer than to those without,” claiming that it will “enrich our democracy by giving people new ways of communicating, complaining and challenging vested interests.”
However, his reasons for implementing such a strategy are more than simply humanitarian. In the Pre-Budget Report, the government resolved to find £11 billion of savings by driving up operational efficiency. PricewaterhouseCoopers has estimated that the government can save £900 million a year just by bringing those who don’t have access to the Internet online – so that they can carry out transactions with public services more quickly and efficiently – and then switching off analogue government services.
Moreover, the government is committed to achieving £4 billion of savings from back office functions by 2012-13. This will largely be achieved by implementing modern digital platforms wherever possible and establishing shared services.
Troubled battery maker Northvolt reportedly considers Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States as…
Microsoft's cloud business practices are reportedly facing a potential anti-competitive investigation by the FTC
Ilya Lichtenstein sentenced to five years in prison for hacking into a virtual currency exchange…
Target for Elon Musk's lawsuit, hate speech watchdog CCDH, announces its decision to quit X…
Antitrust penalty. European Commission fines Meta a hefty €798m ($843m) for tying Facebook Marketplace to…
Elon Musk continues to provoke the ire of various leaders around the world with his…
View Comments
I hope that this potentially means a move away from legacy copper and a move towards fibre?
Apart from download bandwidth, this should allow improved upload bandwidth which for folk like me is increasingly important as we wrestle with internet publishing content demands (especially video) and the ability to provide quality live webcasting for e.g. e-Learning and entertainment. (This is particularly true of the need for mobile webcasting of live events - so come on Three - you have the potential to do this!)
Whilst SDSL is available in some locations and leased lines are available for those who can afford them it is surely not unreasonable to expect some reasonable increase in current 'standard broadband account' upload bandwidth to say 1-2Mbs?