Computacenter Adopts NetApp For Virtual Data Centres

Infrastructure service provider Computacenter has turned to storage vendor NetApp to build a virtual data centre service for customers.

NetApp’s FlexPod architecture can expand in four directions – increasing storage, network bandwidth, servers or applications, allowing customers to save because they don’t have to invest in infrastructure they don’t need, explained the company at a London launch.

Virtualised Data Centre

Computacenter’s Virtual Datacenter service uses Cisco’s Unified Computing System (UCS) for its infrastructure and  VMWare for virtualisation, but Computacenter majored on its agreement to use NetApp FlexPod at the launch.

“Why NetApp, and not Exadata or Vblocks?” asked Neill Burton, data centre solutions director at Compuatacenter, referring to storage products from Oracle and EMC, both of which Computacenter supports. “It was a simple decision.” NetApp, he said, had good products for unstructured data and good partnerships with other vendors and sales channels.

Computacenter claims VDC will offer IT cost savings of up to 30 percent, mostly through the elimination of the need for permanent spare capacity. Compared to other options, it is more flexible, said Burton: other solutions might require fixed storage, networking or server components.

The company will underwrite the cost savings, offering a refund if promised savings do not emerge. “We are so confident that if we are wrong we’ll write you a cheque,” said Matthew Yeager, practice leader for storage at Computacenter. “That should liberate the budget for the customer.”

Peter Judge

Peter Judge has been involved with tech B2B publishing in the UK for many years, working at Ziff-Davis, ZDNet, IDG and Reed. His main interests are networking security, mobility and cloud

View Comments

  • FlexPod is not similar to Exadata and not similar to Vblock - they are all three different things. It's like saying I prefer to drive 10 miles to work instead of flying or walking. Doesn't make any sense.

    1 - FlexPod is a PDF and a sticker, it's no different from what all infra guys are doing today but with less choice.
    2 - Exadata is focused on solving one workload problem.
    3 - Vblocks are an orderable solution, prebuilt, delivered to your datacenter in six weeks from order, and has many solutions on top of it.

    Interesting to note my friend Matt from CC offering to underwrite promised savings, so is the point that it's cheaper? Is that really what it's all about?

    What about business partnership, shared risk, joint go-to-market, innovation, value, service creation, solution delivery, new revenue lines, better margins - that's what you will get from a VCE powered Vblock System delivered either direct or through a partner.

    Just my 2p!

  • Partners cant sit by and ignore the traction that Flexpod has in the market. Virtualisation is driving our business to be more efficient and to do more with less.

    The traction of Flexpod in the market is a direct result of the overall success that both NetApp and Cisco are having in the virtualisation space. Unified solutions out of the box that drive down DC costs while providing more is something every Partner and Customer are acutely aware of.

    On a competitive front some People would Argue that Exadata has a limited market and VBlock is far too rigid and requies too many ticks in the boxes to make it a reality. Nothing like selling the customer the Vblock story and delivering them a VCE solution with one the sticker.

    Its all about customer and whats right for them.

  • @Steve -

    You're a bright guy, and a brilliant technologist, yet i can't figure out why you'd post such comments.

    A vblock is a prevalidated cloud architecture comprised of Cisco, VMware, and EMC that is distributed by VCE who also provides the architecture validation.

    A FlexPod is a prevalidated cloud architecture comprised of Cisco, VMware, and NetApp that is distributed by global channel partners. FlexPod (both architecture and application solutions) are validated by Cisco and are published as CVDs.

    So help me out as I don't understand your comments around a pdf. Are you suggesting the Cisco Validated Designs are worthless?

    What is being missed here is beyond the technical differences (vblock offers multifarious arrays and array capabilities where as FlexPod provides unified arrays with identical functionality regardless of hw scale) is that both solutions are designed to accelerate the adoption of cloud computing and the value that comes with such an operational model.

    Let's drop the vendor bickering, and celebrate the fact that Computacenter is cloud enabled! Kudos Computacenter!

    Just my $0.02
    Vaughn

Recent Posts

QR Codes Enable New Enterprise Phishing Threat

Enterprises increasingly targeted by scam QR codes embedded in PDF documents attached to emails, in…

14 hours ago

White House Finalises China Tech Investment Curbs

Administration publishes final restrictions on US investment into Chinese tech sectors including AI, chips, quantum…

15 hours ago

Toyota, NTT Invest $3bn In Autonomous Driving

Companies reportedly working together on autonomous AI system to predict accidents before they happen, take…

15 hours ago

Latest Funding Round Values Start-Up Sierra AI At $4.5bn

Start-up Sierra AI, co-founded by former Salesforce co-chief Bret Taylor, sees valuation more than quadruple…

16 hours ago

Apple Rolls Out First iPhone AI Features In Software Update

Apple adds first 'Apple Intelligence' features to iPhones, iPads and Macs in new software update,…

16 hours ago

Intel Invests $300m To Expand China Chip Processing Plant

Intel to expand operations at major chip packaging and testing plant in Chengdu, in show…

17 hours ago