HP Takes £5bn Charge For Autonomy ‘Accounting Improprieties’

HP has sustained an $8.8billion (£5.3bn) non-cash impairment charge for “accounting improprieties” relating to its $10.3 billion (£6.7bn) takeover of Autonomy last year.

The company said that the majority of this charge, more than $5 billion, resulted from a number of practices employed by former members of Autonomy’s management team to inflate the value of the company and mislead investors and potential buyers at the time of the acquisition. The remainder of the charge is related to other factors such as the recent trading value of HP stock and marketplace performance.

At the time of the takeover, the purchase price was widely criticised as being too high by analysts. Around 87.3 percent of Autonomy shareholders accepted HP’s offer of £25.50 per share, over 79 percent more than the market price for those shares.

Autonomy overvalued says HP

“HP is extremely disappointed to find that some former members of Autonomy’s management team used accounting improprieties, misrepresentations and disclosure failures to inflate the underlying financial metrics of the company, prior to Autonomy’s acquisition by HP,” said HP in a statement. “These efforts appear to have been a willful effort to mislead investors and potential buyers, and severely impacted HP management’s ability to fairly value Autonomy at the time of the deal.”

HP’s findings were the result of an internal investigation and forensic review of Autonomy’s historical financial results prior to the takeover.

“HP launched its internal investigation into these issues after a senior member of Autonomy’s leadership team came forward, following the departure of Autonomy founder Mike Lynch (pictured), alleging that there had been a series of questionable accounting and business practices at Autonomy prior to the acquisition by HP,” said the company. “This individual provided numerous details about which HP previously had no knowledge or visibility.”

“The company intends to aggressively pursue this matter in the months to come,” said HP, adding that it was ready to take legal action against certain individuals to recoup what it could for shareholders. It has also referred its findings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Enforcement Division and the UK Serious Fraud Office for civil criminal investigations.

We remain 100 percent committed to Autonomy and its industry-leading technology,” said HP.

What do you know about Hewlett-Packard? Find out with our quiz!

Steve McCaskill

Steve McCaskill is editor of TechWeekEurope and ChannelBiz. He joined as a reporter in 2011 and covers all areas of IT, with a particular interest in telecommunications, mobile and networking, along with sports technology.

View Comments

  • We recieved the following comment from Victor Basta, managing director of Magister Advisors:

    “HP’s pursuit of a “buy software to get out of hardware” strategy has failed. Autonomy was always an off piste deal. Many large businesses will do a series of bread and butter mid-sized deals, but in HP’s case they went for broke.

    HP are clearly on a mission to change but it was essential they worked first to fix the culture and revamp the business before making a game-changing acquisition. HP’s leadership made a huge mistake by attempting to ‘fix by buying’.

    “Autonomy’s business is based on a one time software licence model as opposed to a subscription model. At the time of acquisition it was also growing very fast. Put that speed of growth and the one off sales model together and you have a business that is incredibly difficult to value and very challenging to manage and integrate. Candidly, it was like putting an 18 year old who just passed their driving instruction behind the wheel of a Ferrari.

    “The markets, quite reasonably, have been asking the question: “what happened to the $13 billion?” What’s clear is that the business hasn’t been able to cohere around a strategy for integrating Autonomy and transforming the HP business.”

    “It needn’t have been this way. IBM achieved it, Dell has been hard at work doing the same through a range of acquisitions, including Quest and Perot Systems. It is difficult, not impossible.

    HP would have been far better off targeting, like IBM and Dell, a range of smaller acquisitions, with more predictable revenue, and which they could gradually build around. It takes a decade, not a year, to achieve this kind of change.

    HP’s culture has however made it impossible. Transitioning from a hardware business to a software business requires a fundamental shift in corporate culture – and that is something that you simply can’t buy.”

Recent Posts

Apple, Google Mobile Ecosystems Should Be Investigated, CMA Told

CMA receives 'provisional recommendation' from independent inquiry that Apple,Google mobile ecosystem needs investigation

2 days ago

Australia Rejects Elon Musk Claim About Social Media Ban For Under-16s

Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…

2 days ago

Northvolt Files For Bankruptcy Protection In US

Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…

2 days ago

UK’s CMA Readies Cloud Sector “Behavioural” Remedies – Report

Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector

3 days ago

Former Policy Boss At X, Nick Pickles, Joins Sam Altman Venture

Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…

3 days ago

Bitcoin Rises Above $96,000 Amid Trump Optimism

Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…

3 days ago