The extradition hearings for WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange began yesterday, 7 February, and from early morning a crowd of protesters staked out the court, dressed in Guantánamo Bay yellow.
The decision to wear the coloured uniforms of the US prisoners held on the Cuban mainland was made because WikiLeaks supporters believe that the extradition will lead to a further move for Assange to face trial in the US.
This was a point made by Assange’s legal representative Geoffrey Robertson QC. He said that the charge of “minor rape” was not acknowledged by European courts and that the fact that it would be heard in secret violated European laws governing court hearings.
Clare Montgomery, representing the Swedish lawyer seeking the extradition, said that sending him to face trial was necessary because Swedish prosecutors had “sufficient intention to prosecute” even though no formal case has been presented.
Assange has stung the authorities in the US with his revelations of cables that fell into his hands. These messages were between government officials across the globe and their public release has caused severe embarrassment to the US, especially in its world standings.
No case has yet been brought against him by the US courts but it is only a matter of time before prosecutors will have established a legal footing to apply for Assange’s further extradition to face trial.
The judge has over-ruled as irrelevant any claims that Assange will be handed over to the US and severely dealt with because it is based on supposition and not based on fact.
The extradition hearings are expected to last several days.
Recently, there have been several arrests of people believed to have been part of Anonymous attacks. In retaliation, the group has turned its attention on HBGary Federal, a malware detection and protection company, declared by Anonymous to be a “FBI snitch”.
Aaron Barr, the head of security services at HBGary, has claimed to have details of the leaders of the Anonymous group which will be turned over to the FBI. Although the official Website of Anonymous claims that these details, including names, are “woefully inaccurate”, it has singled the US company out for special treatment.
Forgoing the usual DDoS attacks, Anonymous has said, “Within hours of learning [about the files], Anonymous infiltrated HBGary Federal’s network and Websites.”
The group claims to have acquired the offending document and 50,000 company emails which are now being distributed on the Internet. HBGary’s Website has also been defaced and Barr’s Twitter account has been hijacked, along with other social networking accounts owned by the company, Anonymous claims.
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
View Comments
Anonymous claims to be the heroes of the internet and they do nothing but act like digital barbarians. I do hope HBGary has copies of those details. No way they should let those clowns get away with digital vigilantism
Whats the point? Anonymous already uploaded the very document you're speaking of AFAIK :/
You know you're bad ass when you go hack into someone's shit after essentially threatening you, and then release the very same info that was going to be used against you.
We are Anonymous.
You are a nobody...but have no fear....we're coming for you.
We are everyone. No one shall defeat us.
To oppose us is to oppose freedom, True Democracy, and the spread of information.
One cannot stand by as our freedoms are revoked and destroyed. This is very much the same as the origin of the USA, who apparently seem to have forgotten their roots to say the least.
Let me know how your false democracy // dictatorship is doing for you kk?
Surely, here's the bottom line: would he be guaranteed a fair trial outside the UK?
Is there reasonable doubt that he WOULDN'T?
Of course there is.
Thus, he shouldn't be extradited.
FYI, all the Wikileaks videos are on this hub:
http://wikileaks.videohq.tv