The five publishers charged in the case – Hachette Book Group, Macmillan, HarperCollins, Penguin Group and Simon & Schuster – all reached settlements with the federal government and the states involved. However, Apple officials decided to go to trial.
Evidence in the trial painted an aggressive Apple whose executives first met with the publishers in mid-December 2009 and negotiated hard with the book companies to come up with a way to drive up ebook prices. Apple wanted to use the 2010 launch of the iPad as the vehicle for announcing its iBookstore, and wanted the online store to be well-stocked. They also wanted to ensure price parity, so that Apple wouldn’t need to compete with Amazon prices.
“Publishers are actually withholding their books from Amazon because they are not happy,” he told the reporter, according to the evidence.
The judge noted that Jobs’ statement was among a large amount of evidence regarding Apple’s role in the push to increase ebook prices.
“Working against its own internal deadline, Apple achieved for this industry in a matter of weeks what the Publisher Defendants had been unable to accomplish for months before Apple became their partner,” Cote said.
How well do you know Apple? Take our quiz!
Originally published on eWeek.
Page: 1 2
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
US prosecutors confirm earlier reports, demand Google sells off Chrome web browser and end default…
Following Australia? Technology secretary Peter Kyle says possible ban on social media for under-16s in…
Restructuring expert appointed to oversea Northvolt's main facility in northern Sweden, amid financial worries