The chairman of the Free Software Foundation (FSF) is less than impressed at Microsoft’s recently created open source body, Codeplex, after he launched a stinging attack on Redmond’s motives behind its open source agenda.
Writing on his blog this week, Richard M. Stallman, GNU founder and president of the FSF, took issue with Microsoft over Codeplex, and made clear his distrust of the body.
“Many in our community are suspicious of the CodePlex Foundation,” he wrote. “With its board of directors dominated by Microsoft employees and ex-employees, plus apologist Miguel de Icaza, there is plenty of reason to be wary of the organisation.”
“The first thing we see is that the organisation ducks the issue of users’ freedom; it uses the term “open source” and does not speak of ‘free software’, he wrote. “Evidently Microsoft would rather confront the practical competition of open source than the free software movement’s ethical criticism. Its long standing practice of criticising only ‘open source’ does double duty: attacking one opponent while distracting attention from the other.”
Stallman said that he felt that CodePlex follows the same practice.
“Its stated goal is to convince ‘commercial software companies’ to contribute more to ‘open source’,” he wrote. “Since nearly all open source programs are also free software, these programs will probably be free, but the ‘open source’ philosophy doesn’t teach developers to defend their freedom. If they don’t understand the importance of this freedom, developers may succumb to Microsoft’s ploys encouraging them to use weaker licenses that are vulnerable to ’embrace and extend’ or patent co-optation, and to make free software dependent on proprietary platforms,” he warned.
He also hinted at other motives Microsoft has for creating CodePlex.
“Sam Ramji, now president of CodePlex, said a few months ago that Microsoft (then his employer) wanted to promote development of free applications that encourage use of Microsoft Windows,” Stallman wrote. “Perhaps the aim of CodePlex is to suborn free software application developers into making Windows their main platform. Many of the projects hosted now on codeplex.com are add-ons for proprietary software.”
Stallman warned non-free software takes away user freedom.
“To avoid being harmed in that way, we need to reject proprietary system platforms as well as proprietary applications,” he wrote. “CodePlex free add-ons to a proprietary base increase society’s dependence on that base – the opposite of what we need.”
“However good or bad the CodePlex Foundation’s actions, we must not accept them as an excuse for Microsoft’s acts of aggression against our community,” Stallman concluded. “From its recent attempt to sell patents to proxy trolls who could then do dirty work against GNU/Linux to its longstanding promotion of Digital Restrictions Management, Microsoft continues to act to harm us. We would be fools indeed to let anything distract us from that.”
A Microsoft spokesman told eWEEK Europe that it would comment on statements by Richard Stallman or the Free Software Foundation in general.
US finalises $4.7bn award to Samsung Electronics, $1.6bn to Texas Instruments to boost domestic chip…
OpenAI begins safety testing of new model o3 that uses 'reasoning' process to ensure reliability…
US Commerce Department reportedly adding China's Sophgo to trade blacklist after TSMC-manufactured part found in…
Amazon staff in seven cities across US go on strike after company fails to negotiate,…
Two US senators ask president Joe Biden to delay TikTok ban by 90 days after…
Reporters Without Borders calls on Apple to remove AI notification summaries feature after it generates…
View Comments
RMS is a relic from another era, he has NO credability.
But feel free to use him as your spiritual leader.
He does look an awefull lot like that Um supreme sect leader after all :)
We don't actually have a spiritual leader at eWEEK Europe (unless you count myself, of course).
In fact, we're not sure what a technology news site would do with such a thing as a spiritual leader.
However, we do think the creator of GNU and the free software movement has opinions that are worth hearing - and in our view he certainly has credibility (or "credability" as you put it).
Peter Judge
Someone like RMS has written an important part of free software and created the free software movement that gave birth after the open software movement, which now wants to get Microsoft, very likely to sabotage the party.
Stallman is consistent with his thought of freedom not only has the moral high ground and credibility but also should take their warnings seriously.
Stallman's message is valid, not in vain that warns of the pitfalls that corporations like Microsoft use and have done so much damage to our freedom.
I regret that your opinion is so simple and Manichean as that RMS is archaic or member of a sect, but instead you do not argue the issues he has written.
Think about the pitfalls of Microsoft with KKNET to try to halt the development of languages that are open and free as Java, PHP and Python and search Web applications are developed under their operating system.
Or the traps with the "open document" means docx, xlsx and pptx already proven that it is not open, her desperation to maintain control on the desktop of users and further traps the "ribbon" in its Office2007 to change the classic menu that copying itself in the 90s and since then has been shared between applications, or the traps of "Bing", which by default puts in your browser now, webmail and other services that corporation controls.
It will never be archaic the challenge of fighting for freedom, sorry for those who do not want to fight for their rights. "There is none so blind as those who do not want to see."