When Google released its Google Buzz social sharing service on 9 February, it became natural to speculate whether Buzz would threaten Facebook in the social networking arena.
It won’t because, simply, users have become quite comfortable with Facebook and some of the 400 million users have generated a lot of content there in the last six years. That’s content that stays there.
Google Buzz lets users post status updates and share Picasa photos, YouTube videos, links and other content right in Gmail. Originally designed to automatically push updates to Gmail users from fellow users with whom they exchange email and engage in chat sessions, the service and its parent became entangled in nasty privacy snafus.
Google added a tickbox on 11 February to warn users that Buzz will show the names of Gmail contacts they follow and people following them on their Google profile. Google also made a number of other privacy controls more visible. After further complaints, Google made Buzz auto-suggest, letting users opt in to who they want to follow.
Google Buzz product manager Todd Jackson has publicly apologised for the stress Buzz has caused has been telling press that Google should have tested it out with the families of Google’s 20,000 employees.
While it may be tempting to label Buzz a failure and compare it to Facebook’s Beacon, which also exposed users’ social activities to friends in a major privacy snafu, the fact is that Google is leveraging its large user base of 176 million users.
Thanks to the original auto-follow roll-out, Buzz gained tens of millions of users the moment Google turned it on for a portion of users last Tuesday.
Buzz isn’t a failure, and Google is saying and doing the right things to resolve its privacy and public relations headache. Buzz will be a success, in so far as a company can succeed turning email, which Altimeter Group analyst Jeremiah Owyang calls a “historical social graph,” inside out as a social experience.
Buzz will hit a ceiling and that ceiling is the number of Gmail users, the majority of which are probably also Facebook users. It’s hard to see Facebook users fleeing the leading social network for the new, less fully featured experience of Buzz. Sure, you can share links, photos and videos and post status updates in Buzz, just as a user might do in Facebook.
Now, we mustn’t forget that Google pledged to bring Buzz to Google Wave and possibly Google Voice, so there is the potential to reach a few more million users (Voice has between 1 and two million users, while Wave has over 1 million).
But Facebook has more than double the users of Gmail, Wave, Voice and other Google Apps combined. Facebook users have become comfortable with the service, with an average user spending 20 minutes or more per day behind the walled garden of social delights.
Facebook is not afraid of Buzz. The company acknowledged the difficulty in Buzz’s goal of socialising an email inbox, which offers a balance between personal and professional relationships, in a public statement to me:
“The continued growth of the social web will be determined by people and personal relationships. The people that you email and chat with the most may not be your closest friends or the people that you want to share and connect with. We’re supportive of technologies that help make the web more social and the world more open, and we’re interested to see how Google Buzz progresses over time.”
In other words, Facebook doesn’t believe Google “gets” the social web. No threat there.
How can a newfangled service lure customers or users, as it were, away from their comfort zones?
It’s tough. Buzz will gain some users who despise Facebook; it’s already got cheerleaders such as Jason Calacanis stumping for the service. But it also has privacy experts who revile the service.
Google’s challenge with Buzz is similar to that of the stacked deck Microsoft Bing and Yahoo face every waking day in search. Just ask Bing, which has taken 8 months to gain 3 percentage points of market share and now sits at 11.3 percent.
That’s actually a lot of search share in so short a time, but even if Bing gains 5 percent share per year, it would still take more than a decade to catch Google, which is at 65 percent. No one believes that is going to happen. Well, maybe Microsoft does. It’s okay to possess delusions of grandeur.
So it goes with Buzz. If Google thinks Buzz is going to trigger a mass exodus from Facebook, where users are most comfortable, it also suffers from delusions of grandeur.
That’s okay. It’s all in the spirit of healthy competition as Google and Facebook fight for one of the greenest online frontiers after mobile: the social ad space.
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
View Comments
I think Buzz could be a big hit, however, Google has to overcome the negative publicity recently generated by the stand in China. I think they did the right thing however, for whatever reason they stood up to be counted. It was important to them and they did it.
Here is my concern, I just started a business, I had 4 blogs, one of which is mentioned in this comment. They were taken down by Google. I did not get one email or anything to tell me why before hand. I am a new member of their business community, and if I made a mistake they should have contacted me before they took my livelihood away. They reinstated one blog, but will not even give me the courtesy of any communication with them at all. The one blog was restored because they said their software said I used spam on my blogs. They did say that it was in error and they did keep their word and restore the one blog. This was 8 days ago and outside the initial conversation, I have heard nothing.
When I was researching the internet, I ran across a lot of disgrunted former-Google customers who are bitter and discontented because of their own nightmares with Google.
Is it because they are so big that they feel they can treat their customers like this? I was so proud to be a colleague with them, to be partnering with them.
For the first time in many years I could see a future that was financially secure.
And in one moment, Google took it away from me.
Any Advice?