Apple’s refusal to consider unlocking an iPhone 5C belonging to Syed Rizwan Farook for the FBI investigating the mass shooting in San Bernadino, California has resulted in the issue of smartphone encryption being pushed to the top of the tech agenda once again.
The FBI says it is an issue of national security and that this instance is a one-off. But Apple says merely creating code that could unlock the device – if it is possible – would break the trust of its customers and its very existence means other agencies could ask it to unlock more devices.
The company has the support of other major tech firms like Facebook, Google and Twitter, but public opinion is split. However, the FBI says Apple’s stance is a marketing ploy.
But what do you think? Should smartphone makers do everything in their power to help authorities? Should they introduce backdoors? Let us know in our poll below and if you have any other opinions, let us know in the comment section.
Can you protect your privacy online? Take our quiz!
Denial from TSMC, after multiple reports it was in talks with Intel over a joint…
CEO Tim Cook talks to Trump official, as IDC notes China's smartphone market growth, and…
Another big name chip maker expects a hefty financial charge, after the US tightened rules…
More bad news for Google. Second time in less than a year that some part…
Federal office that tackled misinformation and disinformation from hostile nations is closed down, after criticism…
After Nvidia admits it will take $5.5 billion charge as Trump export limits of slower…