A cheap robot has been used by a team of hackers to crack a safe in around half an hour, demonstrating the efficiency of machines over humans.
The $200 robot assembled by hacker team SparkFun Electronics was demonstrated on stage at hacker conference DefCon in Las Vegas, where it was able to crack a combination safe from a leading brand SentrySafe.
From there it could reduce the amount of combinations it needed to test from a million to one thousand and thus rapidly test combinations faster than a human could.
The robot was assembled from 3D printed parts and uses an Ardunio chip to power it, while magnets allow for it to be attached to the exterior of a safe. Easily interchangeable parts allow for it to be matched to any combinations safe.
Of course, the robot cannot tackle digital safes, but they can potentially be hacked in other ways, What SparkFun Electronics showed was how technology can be used to bypass even old physical and ‘analogue’ security systems.
“No matter how much money you spend on a safe… nothing is impervious,” SparkFun’s Nathan Siedle told the BBC.
Some notable tech luminaries are worried about the rise of artificial intelligence and robots posing a threat to humanity, while others are concerned robots will steal human jobs.
But with SparkFun Electronic’s robot, perhaps they should be more concerned about robots stealing their valuables.
Put your knowledge of artificial intelligence to the test. Try our quiz!
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
View Comments
It's not a robot its a mechanism - are all mechanisms Robots - I think not !!