British Internet users seem to like their online smut, at least according to the communications regulator Ofcom, that is.
It found that the overwhelming majority of Brits do not take advantage of ISP filters designed to prevent access to online pornography and other adult content.
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) reached an agreement with the Government to offer parental controls to customers in order prevent children from accessing inappropriate online content.
Many ISPs opted not to implement the filters.
According to Ofcom’s fourth report into the takeup of the network filters, it seems that Sky customers (30 to 40 percent) are the goodie two shoes, as their customers are the most likely to implement the filters. BT customers (only 6 percent) on the other hand are the less likely to continue using the filter.
The report also found that 97 percent of those using the filters said they were useful.
Parents are also increasingly aware of the ISP content filters, with 57 percent saying they are aware of the filters. And it seems that parents are also trusting of their children’s online surfing habits, with 78 percent saying they trusted their children to use the internet safely.
But there is little disguising the fact that many are simply not using the filters at all. Half of parents said they prefer to talk to their children, four in ten said they trusted their children to act in a responsible way online, and two in ten said their children were always supervised whilst online.
The Government has been a big driver in the fight against online porn being accessible to the underage. In July, the Government’s efforts to tackle online pornography changed yet again with the confirmation it would introduce age verification mechanisms to halt kids from accessing pornographic websites.
The Government warned at the time that it is prepared to legislate if the industry fails to self regulate. But many experts point out the government is powerless to act here, as most major porn websites are typically overseas-based. Pornhub for example is based in Canada.
The Government had initially planned to block access to online pornography by default after Prime Minister David Cameron announced back in July 2013 that ISPs needed to introduce an opt-in system for customers wishing to see explicit content.
That proposal sparked criticism from libertarians about the issue of internet censorship, and the Government later tweaked the rules to the adult content filter system as it unintentionally blocked educational resources such as sexual health websites.
The Government’s default porn block was also likely to face a European challenge. Therefore following the Conservative election victory in May, it pledged instead to institute a more “effective” online age control mechanism to keep children from viewing pornography.
What do you know about Internet censorship? Take our quiz!
Fourth quarter results beat Wall Street expectations, as overall sales rise 6 percent, but EU…
Hate speech non-profit that defeated Elon Musk's lawsuit, warns X's Community Notes is failing to…
Good luck. Russia demands Google pay a fine worth more than the world's total GDP,…
Google Cloud signs up Spotify, Paramount Global as early customers of its first ARM-based cloud…
Facebook parent Meta warns of 'significant acceleration' in expenditures on AI infrastructure as revenue, profits…
Microsoft says Azure cloud revenues up 33 percent for September quarter as capital expenditures surge…
View Comments
Whole house filters aren't popular because they don't make sense. In a family there are different ages and therefore different content that is age-appropriate; something suitable for a 15 year old may not be for a 10 year old, content suitable for a 10 year old might not be for a 5 year old.
What's needed is better tools. Tools that are controlled by the family that deal with these age differences, and deal also with the reality that we want the 5 year old to become the 15 year old that can look after themselves on the Internet i.e tools that help them to grow up to be safe online.
Disclosure: I'm involved in the development of such tools.
Perhaps a better conclusion would be :
British people don't like a nanny state and being censored!