The Dutch government has pledged not to weaken encryption by forcing technology companies to hand over encrypted communications to intelligence agencies.

The stance is in marked contrast to the United States and United Kingdom, both of which want tech firms to install ‘backdoors’ to help in the fight against terrorism.

Dutch Refusal

Following the Paris terrorist attacks last year, the government in the Netherlands conducted a review of its policies to determine whether it needed to alter positions.This review concluded that “restrictive” measures would put citizens at risk.

In a letter published this week (in Dutch), the Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice admitted that there were arguments for and against “strong encryption”.

The executive cabinet endorsed “the importance of strong encryption for Internet security to support the protection of privacy for citizens, companies, the government, and the entire Dutch economy,” Ard van der Steur, the Dutch minister of security and justice, wrote in a statement translated by The Daily Dot.

“Therefore, the government believes that it is currently not desirable to take legal measures against the development, availability and use of encryption within the Netherlands,” said van der Steur.

Encryption Backdoors

British Prime Minister David Cameron is among those who want an encryption backdoor. The Manhattan District Attorney has also recently demanded weaker smartphone encryption.

President Obama wants to access to encrypted messages, and he has previously asked tech companies to allow the government to break that encryption when necessary. That said, the White House recently backed down on the matter.

It came after a furious response from leading technology companies and privacy campaigners, who have consistently opposed efforts to weaken encryption systems.

Last June a number of leading technology companies including Google, Apple, IBM, Microsoft and Facebook wrote a strongly-worded open letter to President Obama, calling for him to respect the privacy rights of consumers by not weakening encryption systems.

Yet pressure from law enforcement remains. Last year the chief for Europol said the increasing prevalence of encrypted Internet communications presents a major difficulty for law-enforcement and national security efforts.

US law enforcement have also previously complained that encryption can prevent the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security from examining data during investigations.

The leading counter-terrorism policeman in the UK has also previously said that some tech firms are helping militants avoid detection by developing systems that are “friendly to terrorists”.

Whether the intelligence agencies actually need backdoors to encrypted messages is something of a moot point however. It is thought the NSA and GCHQ already has the supercomputing power to crack 512-bit encryption in just a few minutes.

And the NSA is widely believed to be capable of breaking 1024-bit encryption as well.

Can you protect your privacy online? Take our quiz!

Tom Jowitt

Tom Jowitt is a leading British tech freelancer and long standing contributor to Silicon UK. He is also a bit of a Lord of the Rings nut...

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

2 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

2 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

2 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

3 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

3 days ago