NGOs Call Amazon EU Antitrust Proposals ‘Vague’

Non-governmental bodies and a consumer group have criticised proposals by Amazon as the e-commerce giant seeks to avert a possible EU antitrust fine.

A group of eleven NGOs said Amazon’s proposals were “weak, vague and full of loopholes” and could be easily evaded or abused by the company.

The group urged the European Commission to force Amazon to split its marketplace from its retail and logistics operations to avoid anti-competitive dominance of interrelated services.

The group also said Amazon’s concessions would be less stringent than the requirements for large internet “gatekeepers” under regulations set to come into force next year.

Image credit: European Commission

‘Vague’

“They are weak, vague and full of loopholes, leaving too much room for evasion and abuse by Amazon,” stated the group, which includes LobbyControl, the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), the Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour and the European Public Services Union.

“Moreover, the proposed limitation of these commitments to five years, or indeed any time horizon at all, is unjustifiable.”

Pan-European consumer group BEUC said Amazon should agree not to access the data of third-party sellers and not just to stop using it, as the company proposes.

The company’s proposed second buy box should be tested independently, BEUC said.

Data abuse

The Commission gave third parties until 9 September to provide feedback on Amazon’s offer, which includes a promise not to use sellers’ data for its competing retail business and private label products.

The proposal says Amazon would treat sellers equally when ranking their offers for the “buy” box on its website and would include a second buy box for a rival product if it differs substantially in price and delivery.

The Commission in 2020 said that Amazon was “systematically” using data from third-party sellers on its marketplace to benefit its own retail business.

The agency said at the time it had also opened a second antitrust probe into the possible preferential treatment of Amazon’s own retail offers and those of marketplace sellers that use Amazon’s delivery services.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Virgin Media O2 To Invest £700m To ‘Transform’ 4G, 5G Network

Virgin Media O2 confirms it will invest £2m a day for new mobile masts, small…

2 days ago

Tesla Cybertruck Deliveries On Hold Due To Faulty Side Trim

Deliveries of Telsa's 'bulletproof' Cybertruck are reportedly on hold, amid user complaints side trims are…

2 days ago

Apple Plots Live Translation Option For AirPods – Report

New feature reportedly being developed by Apple for iOS 19, that will allow AirPods to…

2 days ago

Binance Token Rises After Trump Stake Report

Binance BNB token rises after WSJ report the Trump family is in talks to secure…

3 days ago

iRobot Admits ‘Substantial Doubt’ Over Continued Operation

After failed Amazon deal, iRobot warns there is “substantial doubt about the Company's ability to…

3 days ago

Meta’s Community Notes To Use X’s Algorithm

Community Notes testing across Facebook, Instagram and Threads to begin next week in US, using…

3 days ago