Telecommunication firms and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in Australia will soon be required to store the metadata of their customers’ communications for two years.
The requirement comes after both major Australian political parties backed the controversial data retention bill, which permits governmental access to the data, without the need for a search warrant.
Both the ruling Liberal Party of Australia and the opposition Australian Labor Party have backed the bill, with the only opposition coming from the Australian Green party, and several independents. The Greens argued strongly against the law, saying it would entrench “passive, mass surveillance”.
But the major political parties in Australia argued that the law was needed to help law enforcement agencies in their counter-terrorism and serious crime investigations.
The law requires the retention of customer metadata for two years, during which time the Australian law enforcement authorities do not require any search warrant to access the data. Instead, security agencies will be able to access the data if they can make a case that it is “reasonably necessary” to an investigation.
The data stored will be call records (numbers and call length), email and IP addresses, location and billing information, and other customer data. However, the content of the communication will not be stored.
Yet the law is controversial as there has been no public disclosure as to how much it will cost to implement the law. And the Liberal and Labor Party have overruled amendments that would have required the data to be stored on Australian territory.
Other amendments were also rejected, to limit the storage to only three months instead of the current two years, and the requirement for search warrants to access the data.
However, one amendment was made to ensure the protection of journalist data such as whistleblower information and anonymous sources. Australian law enforcement now needs to obtain a search warrant to access this journalist data, and a public interest advocate will argue on behalf of the journalists in each case.
But it seems that Aussie journalists will not even be informed if their data is being requested by the authorities.
Attorney-General George Brandis reportedly said that the legislation strikes the right balance.
“It does contain safeguards that were not there before, it is in the Government’s view, shared I’m pleased to say by the Opposition, a measured and proportionate response,” he was quoted as saying by ABC News.
Telecom firms and ISP in Australia have 18 months to get systems in place to comply with the legislation when it is passed.
The Australian development is in notably contrast to Europe. In April 2014, the highest European Union court, the European Court of Justice, rejected a Directive that told telecoms providers to retain data.
Are you a pedant on privacy? Try our quiz!
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
Judge Kaplan praises former FTX CTO Gary Wang for his co-operation against Sam Bankman-Fried during…
Explore the future of work with the Silicon In Focus Podcast. Discover how AI is…
Executive hits out at the DoJ's “staggering proposal” to force Google to sell off its…
View Comments
The good news for Australians is that they can use a virtual private network (VPN) to hide their IP address, not only from their ISP, but from the 2500 appointed officers of 21 Australian agencies that collects, store and monitor the metadata. Don't forget to try PureVPN if in Australia