Apple And Google Agree ‘No-Poaching’ Staff Deal – Report

Workers have reportedly won a significant legal victory against some of the biggest names in the tech sector following a new ruling concerning a ‘no-poaching deal’ between the likes of Apple and Google.

Four companies, Apple, Google, Adobe and Intel, have allegedly signed a settlement which will end the practice of refusing to take employees from any of the others.

The four have apparently agree a settlement of around $415m (£272m) to four plaintiffs which accused the companies of restricting their right to work where they wanted, according to the New York Times, which cited a person as close to the negotiations as its source.

No-Poaching Pact

The original class-action lawsuit was filed back in 2012 by four Silicon Valley workers, and centred around well known tech firms which had allegedly operated an “anti-poaching” agreement which the workers claimed impacted both their job mobility and limited their earning capacity.

The alleged pact between these tech firms included six bilateral agreements that would prevent any cold-calling and aggressive acquisitions of employees from rival companies. These deals were apparently agreed between 2005 and 2007.

But in 2012 Google was able to secure a senior member of Apple staff for the first time when it hired director of product integrity Simon Prakash. That particular hire indicated that those “no-poaching” agreements were possibly no longer in effect.

The judge presiding over the case had previously referred to emails between the late Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who was deemed to be a ring leader in the alleged conspiracy, and Google chief executive Eric Schmidt, which detailed the supposed pact not to headhunt each other’s employees.

One particular exchange mentioned took place in 2006 when Google abandoned plans to open an engineering office in Paris because of Steve Jobs’ “strong preference” that the search giant did not recruit four Apple engineers central to the project.

In August last year, Judge Lucy Koh of the US District Court for the Northern District of California rejected a settlement offer made by Adobe, Apple, Google and Intel to end the class action lawsuit.

The defendants had offered $324.5m (£213m) to settle the case, but Judge Koh said the amount was too low given the strength of evidence against the defendants.

New Settlement

But now the firms have apparently agreed to a new settlement. It has previously been reported that the plaintiffs had intended to ask for $3bn (£2bn), but Judge Koh had said that any settlement should be at least $380m (£250m).

The case had been closely watched by many firms because of the potential of a costly damages payout. Other firms in other sectors will now have to ensure that they do not have similar types of agreements in place with their corporate rivals.

How well do you know Apple? Take our quiz.

Tom Jowitt

Tom Jowitt is a leading British tech freelancer and long standing contributor to Silicon UK. He is also a bit of a Lord of the Rings nut...

Recent Posts

Apple Sales Rise 6 Percent After Early iPhone 16 Demand

Fourth quarter results beat Wall Street expectations, as overall sales rise 6 percent, but EU…

24 hours ago

X’s Community Notes Fails To Stem US Election Misinformation – Report

Hate speech non-profit that defeated Elon Musk's lawsuit, warns X's Community Notes is failing to…

1 day ago

Google Fined More Than World’s GDP By Russia

Good luck. Russia demands Google pay a fine worth more than the world's total GDP,…

1 day ago

Spotify, Paramount Sign Up To Use Google Cloud ARM Chips

Google Cloud signs up Spotify, Paramount Global as early customers of its first ARM-based cloud…

2 days ago

Meta Warns Of Accelerating AI Infrastructure Costs

Facebook parent Meta warns of 'significant acceleration' in expenditures on AI infrastructure as revenue, profits…

2 days ago

AI Helps Boost Microsoft Cloud Revenues By 33 Percent

Microsoft says Azure cloud revenues up 33 percent for September quarter as capital expenditures surge…

2 days ago