SGI Lives On – As Rackable Renames Itself

Rackable Systems has closed its $42.5 million (£27.8m) deal to buy SGI, and decided to adopt the name, becoming Silicon Graphics International.

After completing the million deal to acquire SGI on 11 May, Rackable officials announced that the company will retain the SGI name — with a twist — and that Rackable will become a brand name within the larger company.

Despite the old SGI’s troubles with debt and bankruptcy, Rackable officials say the name SGI still carries a lot of weight internationally. The new SGI is also retaining several executives from the old SGI as it looks to build out its HPC and visualisation offerings.

For the previous company, SGI stood for Silicon Graphics Inc. With the new company, SGI stands for Silicon Graphics International. That said, the new SGI will keep the old company’s Web address and will be referred to as SGI.

Company officials tossed around many names for the new company — including Rackable Silicon Systems and Rackable Graphics — but decided Silicon Graphics International made the most sense, said George Skaff, chief marketing officer at SGI, despite SGI’s recent history of poor business decisions, bankruptcy and debt. Rackable was a profitable company with no debt, and the business policies that got the company to this point won’t change, he indicated.

“Just because the name is SGI does not mean that our policies are the same as [the old] SGI,” Skaff said, noting that SGI as a brand and as a name is still strong throughout the world. “It is known better internationally than Rackable.”
In addition, given the broader portfolio that includes products from both Rackable and the old SGI, the name Silicon Graphics International fit better, he said.

Charles King, an analyst with Pund-IT Research, said retaining the SGI name makes sense, particularly since SGI’s problems in the past seemed to be highlighted more within the tech industry than outside.

“Despite the trouble [the old] SGI has had as a company, the brand … still holds a lot of credibility, particularly in the areas of visualisation and high-performance computing,” King said. “Not only does the SGI name still have [a] residual legacy [of credibility], but it also allows [Rackable] to move beyond its own legacy of offering data centers in a box and rack-centered systems.”

That seems to be the plan. Rackable is now a brand name for the company’s x86 cluster computing products, joining other brand names such as Altix and InfiniteStorage from the old SGI and ICE Cube from Rackable.

Now comes the work of bringing the two companies together, Skaff said. He declined to talk about plans for the company over the next few months, pointing out that the bankruptcy judge, upon approving the deal, only gave the companies eight days to close.

Right now officials are going with an “adopt and go” strategy, taking the best of both companies and getting rid of the rest, he said.

The old SGI, once a high-flying tech company that made massive computing systems that sold for millions of dollars, fell on hard times when it couldn’t adapt to the changing server landscape, where businesses were buying many small x86 boxes.

In the past few years, the company moved in and out of bankruptcy, and had amassed $526 million (£344m) in debt when Rackable announced April 1 it was buying SGI.

Rackable officials said there were several reasons for buying the struggling company, pointing to complementary products in the HPC and visualization fields, a stronger international reach, and a loyal customer base.

“From Day One, we become a company with presence in 25 countries,” Skaff said, noting that Rackable itself mostly sold in the United States.

He also said customers of the old SGI wanted to continue working with the company, but also wanted more financial stability, which the deal gives them.

“Innovation, expertise and service are at the core of SGI,” Mark Barrenechea, CEO of the old Rackable, and now the new SGI, said in a letter to customers posted 11 May on the company’s site. “We built our company by listening to our customers, providing unique solutions for the toughest and most demanding technology and business problems, offering mass customisation, and being first to market with new component technology in order for our customers to maintain their competitive advantage. This tradition will continue.”

Jeffrey Burt

Jeffrey Burt is a senior editor for eWEEK and contributor to TechWeekEurope

Recent Posts

Apple, Google Mobile Ecosystems Should Be Investigated, CMA Told

CMA receives 'provisional recommendation' from independent inquiry that Apple,Google mobile ecosystem needs investigation

2 days ago

Australia Rejects Elon Musk Claim About Social Media Ban For Under-16s

Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…

2 days ago

Northvolt Files For Bankruptcy Protection In US

Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…

2 days ago

UK’s CMA Readies Cloud Sector “Behavioural” Remedies – Report

Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector

3 days ago

Former Policy Boss At X, Nick Pickles, Joins Sam Altman Venture

Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…

3 days ago

Bitcoin Rises Above $96,000 Amid Trump Optimism

Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…

3 days ago