It is essential that every country builds end-of-life processing capacity for its own eWaste.
Over one billion TVs; one billion mobile phones and over one billion personal computers are now in use. The volume of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) consumed in every country is enormous and growing rapidly.
But there is no mystery about what needs to be done. The policy prescription is relatively straight forward and, for once, the financing solution is clear.
We must resist consultants and commercial interest groups telling us that what we need is a five year research programme to identify the solution to Africa’s eWaste problem. That is a lie.
There are many end-of-life recycling facilities up and running today. They process electrical and electronic equipment proficiently without environmental damage. They result in no landfill; and present no threat to the health and safety of the people who work in the recyling centres.
The best recycling centres exist in countries like Netherlands, Belgium, Germany etc. In fact they exist in precisely those countries that have an effective green and environmental lobby that can force their government to put end-of-life recycling capacity in place.
Computer Aid International worked in concert with many other organisations to ensure that the UK government, dragging its heels, and having missed the deadline, eventually implemented the European WEEE directive in UK law.
In many developing countries the green and environmental campaigning groups are mobilising to force their governments to put into place end-of-life recycling capacity in their countries.
A simple answer
There is no mystery about what needs to be done. It is perfectly plain and straight forward. We know exactly what the legislation must achieve and we know exactly how to finance the whole operation.
When we look at those countries that today already have perfectly good, environmentally friendly, end-of-life recycling solutions in place for eWaste they share several essential features.
And these features correspond to the five central demands that we must make of our governments:
Page: 1 2
CMA receives 'provisional recommendation' from independent inquiry that Apple,Google mobile ecosystem needs investigation
Government minister flatly rejects Elon Musk's “unsurprising” allegation that Australian government seeks control of Internet…
Northvolt files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, and CEO and co-founder…
Targetting AWS, Microsoft? British competition regulator soon to announce “behavioural” remedies for cloud sector
Move to Elon Musk rival. Former senior executive at X joins Sam Altman's venture formerly…
Bitcoin price rises towards $100,000, amid investor optimism of friendlier US regulatory landscape under Donald…
View Comments
Very good article and totally agree with Mr Robert's message.
Largest electronic consumers (Europe and West) have to lead the way and show the path. Mr Robert's correctly states that some European countries are advanced throgh Government enforcements. However, the responsibility clearly lies with the producers.
I hope that this article inspires large manufacturers to set or commission recycling plants in countries like Africa. This would surely be a win win situations for all:
- Producers will see recycling as a value rather then a burden.
- Producers will have another channel to access their valuable raw materials.
- Producers will help create employment where it is needed the most.
- Produces will have another region fr marketing their own recycled products.
- Local government would back producers and welcome such initiatives.
I can't think of any negatives and therefore I am surprised that large manufacturers have not already initiated such programs. Can someone provide further insight or enlightenment?.