The UK government is failing to protect workers against artificial intelligence (AI), which is already used to life-changing decisions across the economy, the Trades Union Congress warned on Tuesday.

The TUC singled out the government’s Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, which reached its second reading in parliament on Monday, saying it would dilute important protections.

One of the bill’s provisions would narrow current restrictions on th use of automated decision-making without meaningful human involvement, while another could limit the need for employers to give staff a say in the introduction of new technologies through impact assessments, the TUC said.

This, combined with a “vague and flimsy” government white paper on the technology published last month raises concerns that “guard rails” in the workplace are becoming nonexistent, the TUC said.

Image credit: Pexels

Hands-off approach

It said the government’s hands-off approach to AI meant there was “no additional capacity or resource to cope with rising demand”.

The TUC said it had found AI being used at all stages of the employment process, from initial sifting of CVs to team allocation, allocation of work, disciplinary measures, through to termination.

AI could “set unrealistic targets that then result in workers being put in dangerous situations that impact negatively on their both physical health and mental well being”, the body warned.

The government responded that the TUC’s assessment was “wrong”, arguing that AI was “set to drive growth and create new highly paid jobs throughout the UK, while allowing us to carry out our existing jobs more efficiently and safely”.

‘Safely and responsibly’

The government said it was “working with businesses and regulators to ensure AI is used safely and responsibly in business settings” and that the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill included “strong safeguards” employers would be required to implement.

The AI white paper proposed spreading regulation of the technology across different existing bodies rather than creating a new dedicated agency or new laws.

The approach contrasts with that of the EU, which is working on far-reaching regulation called the AI Act.

Matthew Broersma

Matt Broersma is a long standing tech freelance, who has worked for Ziff-Davis, ZDnet and other leading publications

Recent Posts

Craig Wright Sentenced For Contempt Of Court

Suspended prison sentence for Craig Wright for “flagrant breach” of court order, after his false…

2 days ago

El Salvador To Sell Or Discontinue Bitcoin Wallet, After IMF Deal

Cash-strapped south American country agrees to sell or discontinue its national Bitcoin wallet after signing…

2 days ago

UK’s ICO Labels Google ‘Irresponsible’ For Tracking Change

Google's change will allow advertisers to track customers' digital “fingerprints”, but UK data protection watchdog…

2 days ago

EU Publishes iOS Interoperability Plans

European Commission publishes preliminary instructions to Apple on how to open up iOS to rivals,…

3 days ago

Momeni Convicted In Bob Lee Murder

San Francisco jury finds Nima Momeni guilty of second-degree murder of Cash App founder Bob…

3 days ago